[FreeNX-kNX / X++ Booster] [FreeNX-kNX] FreeNX namechange

[Mark Van De Vyver]

On 7/13/07, Kent Schumacher <kent at structural-wood.com> wrote:
> Is there any point to using the NX name as part of the new name?  I
> found the multiple NX projects pretty confusing when I was first
> implementing NX stuff, and I think if a break is going to be made,
> dropping NX would be a positive thing.

Nicks' or
Nicks' Viewer/Server or
some more imaginative variation

Q: Whose was/ is Nick?
A: Nicks' was NX (or was NXs' Viewer/Server)


Probably would need to convey it is both client server components.


Gives them some 'credit without being obviously/superficially NX.
But there is may be a '*unix world' rule against using 'names'?


> ---
>
> Of course, now that I've done the abstract argument, I'm going to push
> X-Faster (xfaster?) again as a new name.  I like the nearness to
> x-factor and all that implies, and I like the exactness of X-Faster.
> The goal of the project is to do X, only faster...
>
> ________________________________________________________________
>      Were you helped on this list with your FreeNX problem?
>     Then please write up the solution in the FreeNX Wiki/FAQ:
>   http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=FreeNX_FAQ
>          Don't forget to check the NX Knowledge Base:
>                  http://www.nomachine.com/kb/
>
> ________________________________________________________________
>        FreeNX-kNX mailing list --- FreeNX-kNX at kde.org
>       https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/freenx-knx
> ________________________________________________________________
>