[dot] Savanna Says: KDE 3.2 - A Quick Review
Dot Stories
stories at kdenews.org
Wed Mar 10 20:55:51 CET 2004
URL: http://dot.kde.org/1078946275/
From: Fabrice Mous <fabrice at kde.nl>
Dept: where-upgrades-make-you-dance
Date: Wednesday 10/Mar/2004, @20:17
Savanna Says: KDE 3.2 - A Quick Review
======================================
Right on the heels of the KDE 3.2.1 release, Savanna
[savanna at kdenews.org] is back with an article about her latest upgrade
to the KDE 3.2 desktop. After being on 3.2 beta for several months she
wasn't expecting much of this upgrade.
KDE 3.2 - A QUICK REVIEW
by Savanna [savanna at kdenews.org]
Last week, I finally took the time to upgrade to the fully released
KDE 3.2 desktop system. I was a little nervous at first because, as
many of the devs online can tell you, I really don't know Linux that
well. That means that if something goes wrong, I usually freak out, go
"Oh my God", and panic like never before. Then they usually have to
help me get through the crisis and it always ends up being something
fairly simple and stupid that I did myself.
Needless to say, however, I've been learning. So I took the big
step myself and, happily, I can say that it went off without a single
problem. I'm running KDE 3.2 on Debian - just so you know, and apt-get
is a wonderful tool.
Anyway, after being on the beta release of 3.2 for a few months, I
wasn't expecting much of an upgrade. But, of course, I was wrong.
Beta CVS heads are nice, but they have all sorts of minor quirky
problems. At least that's what it always seems like to me. You know the
type: your memory going off the charts at random moments, memory leaks
making you restart your desktop every few days (unless you know what
you're doing and can shut down the appropriate processes, but we're
talking about me here), little programs that don't work *quite* right
all the time. You know - buggy things. I don't mean Microsoft buggy,
but quirky enough to make you realize that you're still not on a full
release.
Well, all that is gone. So far, I haven't seen a single application
do anything weird. In fact, it's been as stable as ever.
Okay, if you've never run or seen KDE, there are a few things to
know:
1) It's stable.
This is my work computer. I write columns, essays, articles, etc...
And this is my computer on which I do all that work. I browse, email,
organize, read, write, spellcheck and even entertain myself with music
all from this computer. It doesn't crash or give me weird errors. I can
leave it on all day and night (and I do), and I know that nothing will
be lost when I get back to it.
2) It's convenient.
KDE is nice because it has all these integrated packages that work
with it seamlessly. For example, when I blog something and enter the
text into the browser window (Konqueror), I can spellcheck it right
there in the writing box. In fact, it even spellchecks for me while I
type (live spellchecking). No more copy/pasting posts in forums and
blogs to see if you made a typo. It will do it right there. It also has
a nice little dictionary I use all the time on the Kicker (the
applications bar on your desktop), and lots of other things which
integrate so nicely that you never have to really maneuver around one
application to the next to get something done. It's like your whole
desktop is one big application that you use in various ways.
3) It's easy to use.
As I said, I don't know Linux very well at all. But I don't have
to. I've written about this last year in another column, but it bears
repeating again. And since KDE isn't only for Linux, it bears
remembering as well. Just like many of my friends don't know what the
heck a .DAT file is for, I don't have to know what all sorts of techy
Linux files are for either. The reason is that KDE is all I deal with
when I'm on the computer, and that makes it easy to use. Instead of
cryptic command lines, I just have very nice icons everywhere, and I
can customize it any way I like. If the Kicker bar is too long, I can
make it shorter. If I want more desktop space, I can have it with 3
clicks of the mouse. I usually use about 10 virtual desktops on my
system so nothing is ever crowded at all - I always know just where
everything is and I don't have to figure out what goes where because I
never run out of real estate space.
4) It's got everything you need.
Unless you play lots of games, you just don't need Windows anymore.
If you're like me and you use your computer for
writing/browsing/emailing/organizing/listening to music, etc... then
you've got everything you want in KDE and more. And I don't mean really
hard to understand applications with no style at all, but friendly and
nice looking stuff. In fact, some of the applications I use are easier
than the ones I use on Windows (I have two machines, but I use my
Windows one mostly for a few games. If I didn't play games, I'd put KDE
on that too without blinking). 100% of the applications I use in KDE
are friendlier and easier to use than Windows ones. They never crash
and I can customize whatever they look like without even downloading
weird shareware which might, or might not, have a virus or do something
strange to a .DLL file and mess up my system for good. I have no
worries like that. In fact, I have so many options that I now think of
Windows as being very limited and clunky and (gasp) techy to use. That's
right. KDE is that friendly.
5) It's secure.
I just mentioned viruses, and I don't get them. Well actually,
that's not true: people send me viruses from their Outlook mail, and I
giggle. I mean it! I giggle. I don't even have a virus checker. Why?
Because I don't have to worry about it with KDE. They won't run on KDE
so I don't even have to think about it. No Norton subscriptions, no
worries about strange .EXE files being sent to you. To me, viruses are
a thing of the past. I read about how others get their hard drives
trashed, and I smile. Beat that.
6) It's pretty.
KDE is pretty. Hands down, it's just beautiful. Actually it's
gorgeous too. I've got some nice set themes that come installed with
the KDE default, and they are all so amazingly nice that I have a hard
time deciding which to choose from. I've used Windows themes on my XP
box, and it's such a pain in the butt to customize and make it look
nice. Not so with KDE. Every part of the system looks like you can
customize the look with different types of widgets. You just go into
the control panels and click around to suit your taste and apply.
That's it. It can even do desktop slide shows with fade-ins and other
things to make your desktop really come alive and to make it unique.
The icon sets that I have so far are some of the nicest and prettiest
things I've ever seen. And when I get bored of one set, I just choose
another and apply. Even my Kicker bar can have wallpaper (and it does).
I'm glad KDE is this pretty because it makes it look even more
friendly, which is exactly what I want.
7) It's fun.
You want AIM? ICQ? MSN Messenger? No problem. Kopete on KDE gives
you access to all that and more. It's got a beautiful user interface,
awesome icon sets, and it's all integrated into one window and in your
Kicker dock panel. It works flawlessly as far as I can see, and I love
it. Chat to your heart's content.
I also have a nice little weather updater on my Kicker bar with
pretty icons telling me the temperature and what the conditions are
outside. Of course I can look out the window but if I click on this, I
get a nice little window with more info.
I always have music playing with Juk. It's integrated with a small
applet in my Kicker as well (MediaControl) which lets me control
everything from the kicker, even when I'm not on the desktop where Juk
is. I just love that. And if you don't know what Juk is, you can read
my review here.
I said that if you play a lot of games, then maybe KDE isn't for
you, but I wasn't exactly right on that score. KDE does have games
included. And while they aren't the latest shoot-em-up type of games,
they are a heck of a lot nicer than the windows games. You have tons of
fun ones starting with solitaire, backgammon, mahjong, and then even
the best tetris-like game ever called Frozen Bubble (you have to try
this), and some other nice games as well. That just makes you realize
that Windows, as it is, is just a little...boring and stale by now. I
love my KDE games and I do actually play them sometimes to relax.
So all in all, I have to give KDE 3.2 a big thumbs up. It's about
as nice as I ever imagined, stable, easy to use, and practical as well.
If you're completely new to the idea of running something like this,
you really shouldn't worry about it because you'll be up and running in
no time. If you know windows, you can run KDE. After a day, you'll
never want to go back.
So congrats to the KDE Dev team and many thanks. I hope to see even
more surprising refinements in the near future.
More information about the dot-stories
mailing list