kdepim-runtime 16.12.0.1 or just patch it in?

[Albert Astals Cid]

El dimecres, 28 de desembre de 2016, a les 3:43:10 CET, Eric Hameleers va 
escriure:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dimecres, 28 de desembre de 2016, a les 3:29:02 CET, Eric Hameleers va
> > 
> > escriure:
> >> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >>> I was hoping you guys were reading the
> >>> "resources/shared/singlefileresource: Fix DATA LOSS bug in ical resource
> >>> which failed to create std.ics if it didn't exist." thread on
> >>> release-team but since no packager has answered there i'll try here.
> >>> 
> >>> Do you prefer a kdepim-runtime 16.12.0.1 with that data loss patch in?
> >>> Or
> >>> is that 4 version number a problem for you and you prefer to just patch
> >>> it in in your packages?
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> 
> >>>  Albert
> >> 
> >> Hi Albert
> >> 
> >> I would prefer an official post-release patch to address this issue.
> > 
> > I've no idea what "official post-release patch" means :D
> > 
> > You mean an official release that contains the patch? Or an official patch
> > that applies to the release? Or?
> 
> Let me be more specific.
> 
> I meant:
> A patch file.
> Provided by the developer through a URL in the kde.org domain.
> Applying cleanly to the official and original kdepim-runtime 16.12.0
> tarball in the Applications 16.12 download location.

Noone else commented so i kind of forgot about this, oh well, it'll be fixed 
in KDE Applications 16.12.1 so i guess just update to it if you're shipping 
KDE Applications 16.12.0

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Cheers, Eric