rating missing in thumbnails
frederic chaume
frederic.chaume at gmail.com
Sun Jul 21 12:03:53 BST 2024
Hi
I can see the correct rating in windows explorer but when I change it,
it remains 0* in DK
Also I checked the metadata from exiv2 tools and the 1st rating
parameter found is from the namespace Xmp.xmp , which is the 1st in the
list of rating from the advanced metadata settings
....
Xmp.xmp.CreateDate XmpText 19
2024-07-19T18:10:27
Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate XmpText 25
2024-07-21T12:26:36+02:00
Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate XmpText 25
2024-07-21T12:26:36+02:00
Xmp.xmp.CreatorTool XmpText 17 DxO PhotoLab
6.18
*Xmp.xmp.Rating XmpText 1 2*
Xmp.xmp.RatingPercent XmpText 2 25
Xmp.digiKam.ColorLabel XmpText 1 0
Xmp.digiKam.TagsList XmpSeq 7
pays/Bretagne, .....
and when refresh metadata from file , correct rating is shown
"Monitor the albums for external changes" is checked. :
https://imgur.com/a/oQy8O4v
I don't know what's wrong with my configuration, what else can I check ?
frederic
Le 19/07/2024 à 14:49, Frédéric Da Vitoria a écrit :
> Hello Frederic, Maik & Gilles,
>
> FWIW, on my Windows 11 laptop, the DK setting "Monitor the albums for
> external changes" is checked. When I edit the rating of a jpeg using
> the Windows explorer, the new rating is instantaneously updated in DK,
> without my doing anything. I couldn't find "rescan file when files are
> modified".
>
>
> Le 19/07/2024 à 13:44, frederic chaume a écrit :
>> Hi Maik
>>
>> I'm using sidecar for Raw only
>>
>> when I change the rating of the raw file in DXO , I have to "read
>> metadata from file to database" to get it updated in DK. That was
>> already the case in DK8.3 .
>>
>> When I generate a Jpeg from a 2* Raw file with DXO, the generated
>> Jpeg is also a 2* rating but in DK 8.4 it requires to be refreshed
>> using "read metadata from file to database" to make the rating
>> visible while in DK8.3 it was directly shown with 2* rating.
>>
>> I tried setting the "rescan file when files are modified" , but it
>> doesn't change anything.
>>
>> in the advanced metadata setup the rating namespaces are (ordered)
>> xmp.xmp.rating
>> xmp/acdsee.rating
>> xmp.microsoftphoto.rating
>> exif.image.rating
>> exif.imapage.ratingpercent
>> iptc.application2.urgency
>>
>> I didn't change anything recently (and it was working well before)
>> and I don't know if this has an impact for jpeg, but wondering as I'm
>> using now exiftool it doesn't require some update ?
>>
>>
>> Frederic
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 19/07/2024 à 12:29, Maik Qualmann a écrit :
>>> I cannot reproduce any problem here, changes are applied both at
>>> runtime, when
>>> the option to monitor for external changes is enabled, and when digiKam
>>> scanning at start.
>>>
>>> Are you using sidecar? Note, however, that in order to read changes
>>> to rating
>>> values, the metadata option to rescan when changes occur must be
>>> enabled.
>>>
>>> Maik
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, 19. Juli 2024, 10:12:19 MESZ schrieb frederic chaume:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> "monitor the albums for external changes" is already set , and it was
>>>> working well in 8.3.0
>>>>
>>>> frederic
>>>>
>>>> Le 19/07/2024 à 09:56, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Look here :
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.digikam.org/en/setup_application/collections_settings.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> See the note :
>>>>>
>>>>> "The Monitor the Albums for External Changes option will trigger the
>>>>> database to update information. This can be a time-consuming
>>>>> operation
>>>>> especially under macOS and with network file system."
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> Le ven. 19 juil. 2024 à 09:20, frederic chaume
>>>>>
>>>>> <frederic.chaume at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> using DK 8.4 on windows
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I generated a JPG with an external application (DxO). Metadata are
>>>>>> correct except the rating which is missing in the album view , but
>>>>>> present in the metadata view (exiftool/exif/rating 2)
>>>>>> If I refresh using "read metadata from file to database" , rating is
>>>>>> appearing correctly
>>>>>> Question : why this is no more automatic ? (was correct in previous
>>>>>> version). Is there a particular setting for this behavior?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>> Frederic
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20240721/84822fc1/attachment.htm>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list