Face recognition - avoid messing up the data

Helen Jelen inomniapar4tus at gmail.com
Sat Oct 28 06:31:08 BST 2023


Hello, good morning,

Tool looks promising but I can't use it because I'm already using flagging
in a different way, and seems the tool will change all my flags
automatically. Would have been even greater if great DK would allow to use
tags instead, being them more flexible than flags.

Also, would be great if it'd allow to filter which pics to run on by tags
as well (as face recognition does), instead of going all the database
through (as it seems to work, correct me if I'm wrong).

Finally, had to google where this tool is because never expected to find it
under Settings -> Configure DK.

In any case, DK never stops surprising me, such a great software! :-)


BR,

h.


On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:55 PM Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>
wrote:

> hi,
>
> yes there are :
> https://docs.digikam.org/en/maintenance_tools/maintenance_quality.html
>
> It must be used before to process face-management.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> Le lun. 23 oct. 2023 à 13:20, daj omu <dajomu1 at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry. Your answer ended up in the spam folder. I guess that is one
> solution, but I do not know what is good enough or too bad.
> > Does not DK have an image quality sorter? I would assume that DK «knows»
> the quality of a picture and should be able to automatically know if the
> image is too blurry or whatever?
> >
> > Dajomu
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 06:07, Helen Jelen <inomniapar4tus at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hei,
> >>
> >> Didn't you like my suggestion I sent Oct. 8th?
> >>
> >>
> >> BR,
> >>
> >>
> >> h.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023, 22:40 daj omu <dajomu1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> No takers on my question on how to manage faces of bad quality. I want
> the name tag, but do not want the database to become unusable.
> >>>
> >>> DJ
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 18:14, daj omu <dajomu1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Yolo is probably good. Now if I have 20 really good photos for
> training the engine on a specific face and after that I add 50 bad and
> blurry faces, will that mess it up? If so, how can I avoid having the face
> recognition totally messed up after a while?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 17:01, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you use the Yolo v3 DNN face engine, I see very good results in
> >>>>> face workflow. Look the samples listed in online documentation:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://docs.digikam.org/en/main_window/people_view.html#face-detection
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gilles Caulier
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Le sam. 7 oct. 2023 à 11:41, Remco Viëtor <remco.vietor at wanadoo.fr>
> a écrit :
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On samedi 7 octobre 2023 11:27:47 CEST daj omu wrote:
> >>>>> > > Hi,
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Will blurry and low quality images eventually mess up the face
> recognition
> >>>>> > > engine?
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Dajomu
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > There's a saying "garbage in, garbage out"...
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20231028/5a417828/attachment.htm>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list