[digiKam-users] why do I rejoin Digikam MailMan list?

Sebastian Beer sebastian.beer at gmail.com
Tue Jan 18 05:36:55 GMT 2022


I support the idea of using a forum instead of a mailing list!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Sebastian Beer

> Am 18.01.2022 um 03:03 schrieb Ty Mayn <tyrus.mayn at gmail.com>:
> 
> 
>  After study of the public viewable archives I see that discussion is more immediate on this oldfashioned Mailman listservice. Its clear to me that it is small but has some responsive leaders with knowledge.
>     Meanwhile the similarly named digikam Forum hosted by kde is small and more inactive. After posting there this January I resorted to answering my own posting just to be partially useful
> https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256
>      The energy on this list service deserves better tools.
> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/
> The archive has at least 17 years of useful knowledge zipped into 204 separate months that no newcomer (or even old user)will easily search.
>     Has anyone ever prepared and circulated a consolidated archive ready for global search?
>  Every posting member has their  participating email exposed to weak masking that only replaces @ with "at"  while the  forum tools at KDE have good authentication and member shelter.
>     Am I the only one to have spoken on this issue? I would have to search the archives to know but I suppose each current member has a view and every pattern has inertia.  Please accept this as a positive input on a good thing
> Ty Mayn
> 
>    
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20220118/d8266a09/attachment.htm>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list