[digiKam-users] Performance for facees db

[Gilles Caulier]

Hi,

The performance so far is not optimum, and we plan to work on this topic
while this summer with a student. See my other mail on this list posted a
few minutes ago.

Best

Gilles Caulier

Le ven. 14 mai 2021 à 09:34, KRODER Gerhard <gerhard.kroder at t-online.de> a
écrit :

> Hi,
>
> some question about performance...
>
> I resartet update  of faces db  on all pictures, not just new ones. out of
> ~25k images there are ~10k faces found already in previous runs.
>
> Now update runs since about 5h, and is at about ~10%.  Is this a
> reasonable time scaling? Any way to support/accelerate?
>
> No other jobs running, only SSD in system, i57300U runs at 100% (digKam
> process takes ~ 80-95%);
>
>
> Cheers, Gerhard
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210514/c235a7e7/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecfnlgodnikpiopk.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11759 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210514/c235a7e7/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fjnjcjiehpjhddfe.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3817 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210514/c235a7e7/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cadkiigjaegpcoce.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15870 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210514/c235a7e7/attachment-0005.png>