[digiKam-users] Best practice - large database
Stefan Wulff
stefan.wulff at gmx.de
Tue Jan 5 17:04:30 GMT 2021
Hi!
I’m playing around with digikam for about three month and getting more and
more familiar with it. (I've been using thumbsplus on windows +Mariadb on
NAS for many years...)
Actually I’m using
- digikam on 2 macbooks
- maria-db on raspberry pi4 running from usb3-SSD
- abount 35k pictures on Synology NAS
- 1 db for all: core, thumbs, faces
- db size is about 5 GB.
Performance is ok ... but not really fast.
Raspberry Pi und the most used macbook are connect with GBit-Ehternet.
My first trial was maria db on Synology NAS, but it was much too slow
because nearly every db access had to use HDD.
So my questions are:
- Should I divide into separate databases for core, thumbs, faces?
- Is there an option to use smaller thumbnails/preview to reduce db size?
- Other suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
best regards,
Stefan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210105/9320932f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list