[digiKam-users] Latest Imports

Sebastian Beer sebastian.beer at gmail.com
Mon Apr 5 16:30:35 BST 2021


Interesting…
Doing this for a picture which is already in the database works as well.
It simply does not work, when I mark it before import. After Import the flag is missing on the heic-picture.

Schönen Gruß,

Sebastian Beer

> Am 05.04.2021 um 17:24 schrieb Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> 
> No problem here with digiKam 7.3.0 pre-release under MacOS. I used the context menu with 2 items selected (JPEG and HEIF) and set yellow flag. As you can see HEIF has the expected label.
> 
> https://imgur.com/h39GCH1 <https://imgur.com/h39GCH1>
> 
> Gilles Caulier
> 
> Le lun. 5 avr. 2021 à 17:16, Sebastian Beer <sebastian.beer at gmail.com <mailto:sebastian.beer at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> Dear Gilles,
> 
> I did a simple test. Created a new directory on my internal ssd and copied two picture. One jpg and one heic. Opened the import dialogue and marked both pictures with a yellow flag. Imported to a new directory. Here is the result:
> <Bildschirmfoto 2021-04-05 um 17.12.04.png>
> The jpg has the yellow flag while the heic doesn’t.
> Am I doing anything wrong?
> I’m using digiKam 7.2.0 on BigSure latest release.
> 
> Schönen Gruß,
> 
> Sebastian Beer
> 
>> Am 05.04.2021 um 16:55 schrieb Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> If you use a yellow flag or a color label from digiKam, this is stored
>> in database independently of the item format (image, RAW, audio, or
>> video).
>> 
>> So it must work as well in search tool.
>> 
>> Gilles Caulier
>> 
>> Le lun. 5 avr. 2021 à 16:42, Sebastian Beer <sebastian.beer at gmail.com <mailto:sebastian.beer at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Dear Gilles,
>>> 
>>> At least for me that is not a workaround. I’m downloading all pictures into the 2021 folder with subfolders for each day, when a picture is taken. This results in several new folders which are created during each import.
>>> 
>>> I tried a different thing: I flagged all pictures before import with a yellow flag. That is unique since I do not use flags for my work on pictures. However, I have the impression that this flagging does only work for jpg-files and not for heic-files. Am I correct?
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Sebastian Beer
>>> 
>>>> Am 05.04.2021 um 16:06 schrieb Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all users,
>>>> 
>>>> yes this feature is not yet implemented, but, go to
>>>> Setup/Camera/Behavior, and look the default album to use when
>>>> downloading is performed.
>>>> 
>>>> Typically, making search rules in this album to handle only new
>>>> imported items will help a little bit. It's not perfect, but it's a
>>>> good start.
>>>> 
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>> 
>>>> Le lun. 5 avr. 2021 à 12:44, Sebastian Beer <sebastian.beer at gmail.com <mailto:sebastian.beer at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m looking for this feature due to my workflow. After importing a couple of pictures I need to assign them with appropriate tags. Therefore, I need to see only those pictures that I have imported right before.
>>>>> Hopefully this feature will be implemented in one of the next versions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sebastian Beer
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 05.04.2021 um 11:36 schrieb woenx <marcpalaus at hotmail.com <mailto:marcpalaus at hotmail.com>>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think it's not possible now (I could be wrong), but this is a feature I'd
>>>>>> love to have it implemented.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's related tot his feature request I suggested some time ago:
>>>>>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392801 <https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392801>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html <http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html>
>>>>> 
>>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210405/b1b28d9b/attachment.htm>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list