[digiKam-users] a wild idea or wish

[Marc Palaus]

I would totally love to see more AI tools included in Digikam. Like, being able to search for objects or the content of a Picture without having to manually tag them. E.g. searching photos of beaches, or pictures containing dogs but not cats.

Well, as long as the processing is carried offline (or with my permission). I don’t want my personal pictures uploded on some server without my knowledge...

De: Gilles Caulier<mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>
Enviat: dimarts, 28 de juliol de 2020 12:05
Per a: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source<mailto:digikam-users at kde.org>
Tema: Re: [digiKam-users] a wild idea or wish

Hi all,

This kind of photo contents analysis exist already with this CLI tool :

https://github.com/scheckmedia/photils-cli

Photils API is very simple to handle and can be used in a dedicated
digiKam plugin. The image content is analyzed locally, a fingerprint
is computed locally by a AI engine, the photo still on computer. AI
parse the fingerprint and return a list of keywords. Et voilà, you
have the tags to validate in client application.

We plan to include photils as extra digiKam plugin later 7.2.0. Please
be patient...

Best

Gilles Caulier

Le mar. 28 juil. 2020 à 09:15, <neinei at gmx.net> a écrit :
>
> might exist a fork already.
> "Photoprism" seems an alternative using some AI stuff for image
> classification, see:
> https://docs.photoprism.org/developer-guide/metadata/classification/ and
> in more general https://github.com/photoprism/photoprism
> So, somehow object detection seems to be implemented in some open source
> products.
>
>
> On 7/27/20 10:48 PM, Daniel Bauer wrote:
> > I have no idea if this is possible, if the necessary AI exits
> > opensource, but as there is face-recognition in digikam, I dare to throw
> > in my idea:
> >
> > google, facebook and others can recognize the contents of images. If
> > it's a house, a portrait, a beach, a tree, if male/female, if she has
> > nipples or if cheeks are visible (no joke, both facebook and google can
> > and do - with lots of errors, though),  etc.
> >
> > Would it be possible that digikam can analyze and categorize images and
> > make them searchable by content? So that they are searchable by content.
> >
> > That would be fantastic. Imagine!
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20200728/6bc19ef9/attachment.htm>