[digiKam-users] Date taken tag for video files
Gilles Caulier
caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Sat Mar 16 08:05:53 GMT 2019
Nonobio,
This data sheet is very interesting. But unfortunately, i'm not able to
make investiguation without the video file samples shared somewhere in the
cloud to try to reproduce the mesurements and look is the digiKam code can
be improved in ffmpeg metadata parser.
Perhaps also, it's fully relevant of ffmpeg codecs. ffmpeg code is huge and
as i seen, each codec implement a metadata parsing not fully unified
everywhere.
So, i recommend to :
1/ Share your data sheet in a bugzilla entry (a gdoc link is enough)
2/ share your video file in the same bugzilla entry (a link to gdrive for
ex is perfect).
3/ copy and paste your results from this email to the bugzilla entry.
I don't have enough time to investigate now this problem. I'm very busy to
fix the AppImage bundle. It take more time than expected. So archiving your
results in bugzilla is safe in time (better than to use mailing list).
Best
Gilles Caulier
Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 23:50, nonobio <nonobio at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I made complete tests with my different video recording devices and
> applications.
>
> Issues (start video not used and difference of time) are present only with
> my Android Devices, not with my "real" camera devices.
>
> You can consult my sheet comparative here
> <
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vHiruk7Y0XZmNdMOSt0ifCuassatx0LwbW-xLHCpTPE/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> .
>
> I will make some search about that; your infos are welcomed.
>
> Bye
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20190316/1026f190/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list