[digiKam-users] Fwd: Using the Image Quality Sorter

[Maik Qualmann]

Ok, the problem is clear now. We have a problem with searching in the DB for 
unassigned labels. If a "No Pick Label" is assigned, the image is also found, 
but a non-existent pick label entry in the table must also be considered a "No 
Pick Label". The left sidebar is also affected. I will fix it.

Maik

Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2019, 06:50:43 CEST schrieben Sie:
> If you want to select children's albums too, they must also be marked. Use
> the right context menu. What sometimes leads to a problem is the selection
> of tags.Check if they have not selected tags.
> 
> Maik
> 
> Am Montag, 10. Juni 2019, 23:35:27 CEST schrieb James Orr:
> > Well, it seems I was too much in a hurry, and that I misunderstood
> > something in the Tools|Maintenance dialogue box.
> > 
> > I thought when I was in the Process items from: part of the page, I
> > could select one folder and have DK act only on it (and maybe its
> > children). I thought this because I had cleared the box for whole albums
> > collection.
> > 
> > I just started to browse my collection and it appears that almost all of
> > the images in my Pictures folder have been examined. Although I have not
> > inventoried each folder, I did find 3-4 where the CR2 files had not been
> > marked, though the images in the child folders had been marked.
> > 
> > This does seem odd.
> > 
> > Is this worth Bugzilla?
> > 
> > James M. Orr 2705 E Sussex Way Fresno, CA 93726
> > 
> > 
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: 	Using the Image Quality Sorter
> > Date: 	Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:40:47 -0700
> > From: 	James Orr <jorr1948 at earthlink.net>
> > Reply-To: 	jorr1948 at earthlink.net
> > To: 	digikam-users-group--kde.org <digikam-users at kde.org>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > It seems odd to me that the image quality marking feature is located
> > under Maintenance--seems odd to me. Anyway ...
> > 
> > I wanted to be sure that I understand this feature, so I went to the
> > Tools|Maintenance window and cleared all the selections except for using
> > multiple cores and using the Image Quality Sorter (skip images already
> > scanned).  Then I selected one folder with 99 Canon CR2 raw images, and
> > two subfolders with TIF images: one with 33 HDR images and the other
> > with 2 edited images.
> > 
> > I left all of the default options checked under settings.
> > 
> > It took hours and several restarts to get through all the images.
> > 
> > None of the Canon RAW images were marked in any way. The others were.
> > 
> > Is this tool designed to skip Canon RAW images?
> > Is this the level of performance I should expect when using the Image
> > Quality Sorter?