[digiKam-users] LinkedIn user group...

Simon Frei freisim93 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 23 08:34:27 GMT 2019


According to reviews this app is just a webview of discourse. Which
isn't bad, but you can just as well open it in your favorite mobile
browser (which works pretty well, apart from the terrible typing, which
is unrelated :) ).

On 23/01/2019 09:27, Stefan Müller wrote:
> it looks like pixel.us runs a https://www.discourse.org/ instance,
> that's great :), the only thing what is missing is the mobile API to
> access it with
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.discourse.
>
>
> On 23.01.2019 09:11, Remco Viëtor wrote:
>> On mercredi 23 janvier 2019 08:13:30 CET Stephane Ascoet wrote:
>>>> I asked the German Wikipedia for LinkedIn, especially the criticism.
>>>> LinkedIn sends unsolicited invitation emails to non-members, if not
>>>> responding, re- prompts. I have already received 2 invitations from
>>>> you,
>>>> which you probably did not even initiate. ((:-)) It is interesting,
>>>> to an
>>>> e-mail address, which I used perhaps 1 or 2 times provided. LinkedIn
>>>> probably read your e-mail history. I think there are no serious social
>>>> networks in this world.
>>> Hi, I fully agree. When I was on LinkedIn, I saw in my "proposed
>>> contacts" at least one people I didn't want to see(for personnal and
>>> complicated reasons I won't reveal here). The only way to make the link
>>> was to read her address book(or worse). I write "worse" because, yes, I
>>> couldn't think they could do such a thing than reading mail, but I read
>>> or heard something about this. I though it was on this list but after
>>> verification, it seems not. It was about an attorney service. They
>>> don't
>>> have the right to talk to the opposite side, or it could create very
>>> bigs problems. However, the opposite side received an invitation to
>>> join
>>> this attorney's network. It created huge problems, they had much
>>> work to
>>> calm the hurricane it made in the justice institutions. The only way to
>>> make the link between both of them was to read mails where opposite
>>> side's adress was written in the attorney box.
>>>
>>> I closed my account(after having send a mail to my contacts that
>>> probably did have no effect) when I realized that this site with a
>>> professional layer were in fact just like the other ones and I don't
>>> understand why so much activist geeks are on it, especially because I
>>> don't have the feeling that employers use it so much in france(but I
>>> may
>>> be wrong).
>> LinkedIn indeed tend(ed) to spam others, based at least on the
>> address book of
>> members.
>> To the best of my knowledge, I do not have an account on LinkedIn.
>> They seem
>> to agree, as I used to get regular invites to join LinkedIn,
>> supposedly from
>> members/through members. Although that practice seems to have calmed
>> down
>> lately.
>>
>> So, please do not replace this list by anything like LinkedIn, until
>> such
>> methods are abolished.
>>
>> Remco
>>
>>




More information about the Digikam-users mailing list