[digiKam-users] Digikam puts its "signature" in metadata even when no other changes - why?
rafael.linux.user at gmail.com
Sun Sep 23 13:05:57 BST 2018
I understand that Digikam writes to sidecar what he needs to write, and no
more. GIMP does it
In fact, as someone, wrote here, Digikam does NOT write to sidecar while
scanning. If so, I should noticed it each time I launch Digikam, with a
+300K photos database like mine, cause it will be writing to sidecars in the
disk. However, my case
is not related with sidecars (at first sight).
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
More information about the Digikam-users