[digiKam-users] Digikam puts its "signature" in metadata even when no other changes - why?

[Rafael Linux]

I understand that Digikam writes to sidecar what he needs to write, and no
more. GIMP does it
In fact, as someone, wrote here, Digikam does NOT write to sidecar while
scanning. If so, I should noticed it each time I launch Digikam, with a
+300K photos database like mine, cause it will be writing to sidecars in the
disk. However, my case
(http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digiKam-users-Anyone-with-a-300K-photos-internal-mysql-database-td4706440.html)
is not related with sidecars (at first sight).



--
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html