[digiKam-users] digiKam for windows improvements...

frederic chaume frederic.chaume at gmail.com
Sun Sep 2 17:32:24 BST 2018

Le 02/09/2018 à 12:24, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> 2018-09-02 9:24 GMT+02:00 frederic chaume <frederic.chaume at gmail.com 
> <mailto:frederic.chaume at gmail.com>>:
>     Hi Gilles
>     Good news, will test it.
>     just would like to know when the problem I reported on DK6.0 will
>     be fixed:
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397972
>     <https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397972>
>     this is from my point of view a regression compare to DK5.9, as I
>     cannot wait hours before the completion of the flick export (
>     thanks to the performance of my network :-( )
> I will working on this next week. I hope to complete the job for next 
> week end.
once you will have a version available, I will test it
>     I'm also wondering if I will be able to go back to DK5.9. I did it
>     with the early beta version of DK6 but also understood this wasn't
>     recommended because of modification of DB (new DB for similarity
>     that I'm not using for the time being)
> If you have a DB backup done before to test 6.0.0, yes, no problem. 
> Else, 6.0.0 DB and 5.9.0 will not be fully compatible. Trying to run 
> 5.9.0 with a DB from 6.0.0 will introduce some dysfunctions.
I have made effectively a backup, but didn't use it when switching 
between version 5.9 and 6.0 for the time being. I didn't notice any 
error so far but as said I'm not using similarity.
but I will follow your advice and will reuse the 5.9 DB when going back 
to previous version

> Gilles Caulier

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20180902/0f9640d7/attachment.html>

More information about the Digikam-users mailing list