[digiKam-users] Much slower dk 6b2

[digikam at 911networks.com]

2 internal drives: WD 3tb blue each:

Here's the relevant part:

$ df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2       123G   33G   84G  28% /
/dev/sdb1       2.7T  1.7T  931G  65% /drive-b
/dev/sda1       488M   53M  400M  12% /boot
/dev/sda3       2.6T  923G  1.6T  38% /home

Both the photos and the SQLITE db are on /drive-b/ ==> /dev/sdb1

On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 20:01:30 +0100
Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com> wrote:

> And the drive with the images collection and database is located on
> a local, USB or network drive?
> 
> Maik
> 
> Am Freitag, 2. November 2018, 15:33:58 CET schrieb
> digikam at 911networks.com:
> > On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 08:04:38 +0100
> > 
> > Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com> wrote:  
> > > The 55 seconds are already too long. And digiKam-6.0.0-beta2 has
> > > become faster. With your collection size I would expect 2-5
> > > seconds. How many images does the search return?  
> > 
> > Around 12000 images.
> >   
> > > Maik
> > > 
> > > Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018, 16:47:08 CET schrieb
> > > 
> > > digikam at 911networks.com:  
> > > > DK 6b2 appimage: 30-Oct
> > > > 
> > > > I did a backup of my 5.9 dbs and converted to 6b2 appimage
> > > > (dated: 30-Oct). It's nicer but it's much slower, especially
> > > > the searches.
> > > > 
> > > > digikam version 6.0.0-beta2
> > > > Images:
> > > > GIF: 4
> > > > JPG: 859
> > > > PNG: 16
> > > > PSD: 45
> > > > RAW-CR2: 29902
> > > > RAW-DNG: 8443
> > > > RAW-PEF: 1764
> > > > RAW-RAF: 5641
> > > > TIFF: 302
> > > > XCF: 5
> > > > total: 46981
> > > > 
> > > > Total Items: 46981
> > > > Albums: 296
> > > > Tags: 138
> > > > 
> > > > Database backend: QSQLITE
> > > > Database Path: /drive-b/photos/
> > > > 
> > > > A search of photos:
> > > > * 7 tags (in one of)
> > > > * and not 1 tag
> > > > 
> > > > in 6b2: 2 minutes 36 seconds
> > > > in 5.9: 55 or 56 seconds (timed by hand)
> > > > 
> > > > How can speed it up? or is it some debug code?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks  
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
sknahT

vyS