[digiKam-users] updating kipi-plugins

[Gilles Caulier]

Mine, from the AppImage :

digikam version 5.9.0
CPU cores: 3
Eigen: 3.2.5
Exiv2: 0.26
Exiv2 can write to Jp2: Yes
Exiv2 can write to Jpeg: Yes
Exiv2 can write to Pgf: Yes
Exiv2 can write to Png: Yes
Exiv2 can write to Tiff: Yes
Exiv2 supports XMP metadata: Yes
KF5: 5.42.0
LensFun: 0.3.2-0
LibCImg: 130
LibJPEG: 80
LibJasper: 1.900.29
LibLCMS: 2080
LibLqr support: No
LibPGF: 7.15.32
LibPNG: 1.6.34
LibRaw: 0.18.8
LibTIFF: 4.0.9
Marble: 0.27.20
Parallelized demosaicing: Yes
Qt: 5.9.3
AkonadiContact support: no
Baloo support: no
Calendar support: yes
DBus support: Yes
Database backend: QSQLITE
HTML Gallery support: yes
Kipi-Plugins: 5.9.0                                <<== The kipiplugins
version with right value.
LibGphoto2: 2.5.16
LibKipi: 5.2.0                                        <<== Kipi library
interface frozen since a while
LibOpenCV: 3.4.0
LibQtAV: 1.12.0
Media player support: Yes
Panorama support: yes

No problem...

Gilles Caulier

2018-03-19 16:47 GMT+01:00 <cool.chris65 at web.de>:

> Hi
>
> I've just tested DK 5.9.0 - and here it shows also Kipi 5.6.0 as in DK
> 5.8.0
> before?
>
> Greetz,
> Christoph
>
> Am Freitag, 2. Februar 2018, 14:47:44 CET schrieb Tac Tacelosky:
> > Hmm.  My laptop shows a slightly different plugins screen, says 5.6,
> > whereas my desktop (where Flickr is working) shows this.  Same OS, both
> > from the appimage download on digikam.  The only difference with the
> laptop
> > is that at various points it's had digikam 4 and digikam 5.6 installed.
> If
> > the individual plugins have version numbers, they'd be valuable here.
> >
> > Should I run the 5.9 appimage?  There's no mention of plugin changes in
> > 5.9, and am cautious about doing a database migration which might prevent
> > me from using the stable 5.8.
> >
> > Tac
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20180319/f43ac169/attachment.html>