[digiKam-users] either face recognition screen is buggy or I still don't understand it - at least I can say that more convenient bulk change of face tags (no auto refresh / set faces via context menu) is neccessary #V5.9.0 Windows Feb 27 2018

woenx marcpalaus at hotmail.com
Sun Mar 18 20:58:04 GMT 2018


Ok, these are the bug reports corresponding to face management bugs and
improvements as discussed in this thread (and other related threads), in
case anyone wants to follow them:

- Scan single image for faces: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275671
- Inconsistent behavior of "People" Tag: 
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392008
- Face recognition assigns faces to people without confirmation, leading to
false positives: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392010
- Metadata explorer does not show XMP face rectangles:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392013
- Show "Unknown" faces in a more visible and preeminent place in the
"People" list: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392015
- Face tags and regular tags are mixed together and cannot be told apart:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392007
- Confirmed and unconfirmed faces look the same in a person's face list:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392016
- Merging, renaming and removing face tags:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392017
- No possible way of knowing which pictures within a regular tag have been
face-tagged: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392020
- Weird automatic subtag within "Unknown people" called "da":
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392009
- Position of a face tag appears on top or bottom of the list, instead of
being sorted alphabetically: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392022
- Feature request: add "Ignored" group of faces:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392023
- Feature request: group similar faces in "Unknown" faces:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392024

PackElend, I didn't report the bug you explained in your first post since I
didn't fully understand the problem. I think it should be better if you
wrote a bug report yourself.

And that's it. If all of these were solved, face detection and recognition
would be just perfect (apart from the matter of accuracy, of course).



--
Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html



More information about the Digikam-users mailing list