[digiKam-users] Is changing the date of a photo a destructive process?
NeiNei
neinei at gmx.net
Fri Mar 9 09:55:56 GMT 2018
There is an "open with" option in DigiKam on Linux.
For the Windows (and later the MacOSX) version, there is a feature
request where Gilles has been working on it a few days ago. See:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380065
However, for the most recent status of the feature request Gilles may
provide some explanations.
NeiNei
On 09.03.2018 09:17, Stefan Mueller wrote:
> can anyone explain why there isn't any 'open with' in digikam win64?
>
> 2018-03-08 9:18 GMT+01:00 Jack Marxer <jmarxer at gmail.com
> <mailto:jmarxer at gmail.com>>:
>
> I also liked the previous method of renaming files better than using
> the BQM. It clearly displayed the results before commiting changes.
>
> Jack Marxer
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Marie-Noëlle Augendre
> <mnaugendre at gmail.com <mailto:mnaugendre at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I liked better the previous process, outside the BQM. It could
> be used on a selection, displayed a preview of the new date
> before update and - of course - acted on the original picture.
>
> I don't understand why it had been incorporated in the BQM, it
> is much less convenient.
>
> Marie-Noëlle
>
> 2018-03-07 18:50 GMT+01:00 Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin at gmail.com
> <mailto:metzpinguin at gmail.com>>:
>
> The BQM needs a target file. If there are no image editing
> tools in the tool
> list, a copy is made from the source file and no changes are
> made to the image
> data. Even overwrite mode to the target file is safe.
>
> Maik
>
> Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2018, 16:54:30 CET schrieb woenx:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I have been doing some tests, comparing images before and
> after the date was
> > changed in the Batch Queue Manager using an image comparer (
> >
> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Graphic-Others/Image-Compare
> <http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Graphic-Others/Image-Compare>
> > r.shtml
> >
> <http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Graphic-Others/Image-Compa
> <http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Graphic-Others/Image-Compa>
> > rer.shtml> )
> >
> > The file generated after a date change is identical to
> the original, not a
> > single pixel was changed. File size is different due to
> changes in the
> > metadata, but that's it.
> >
> > As a comparison, I tried to open and save the same JPG
> picture using
> > Microsoft Paint, and the image comparer found lots of
> differences to the
> > original.
> >
> > Therefore, I conclude that changing the date in digikam
> is a lossless
> > process.
> >
> >
> > PS: now, if only the date changing process were more
> intuitive in digikam...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html
> <http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> <http://marie-noelle-augendre.com>
> Découvrez mes photos sur mon site
> <http://marie-noelle-augendre.com> ou ma page Facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/PhotographeEnCevennes?ref=bookmarks>
>
> <http://www.blurb.fr/user/mnaugendre><http://marie-noelle-augendre.com>
> <http://www.blurb.fr/user/mnaugendre>
>
> et tous mes livres-photos sur le site Blurb
> <http://www.blurb.fr/user/mnaugendre>
> <http://www.blurb.fr/user/mnaugendre>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list