[digiKam-users] digikam shows wrong create time in thumbnail view - replicable for one user, not for a different one

B.M. b-misc at gmx.ch
Sun Apr 22 14:42:59 BST 2018


Oops, sorry, you're right of course.

Best,
Bernd

On Sonntag, 22. April 2018 15:16:59 CEST Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Modify Date                     : 2001:01:01 01:21:57
> Date/Time Original              : 2012:04:21 13:59:20
> 
> ^^^ how it's possible to create a file in 2012 and modify it in 2001 ???
> 
> Gilles Caulier
> 
> 2018-04-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 B.M. <b-misc at gmx.ch>:
> > Well, I'd appreciate a bit more inputs - why exactly is the jpeg file a
> > mess?
> > There are several dates (modify, create, file modification and file
> > access) and
> > information is reduntant, but I don't see conflicting date/time
> > information.
> > 
> > What I started with is overwriting Original Date by Create Date, but doing
> > it
> > with the BQM for several 10'000 files in many different folders takes
> > quite
> > some time, so I decided to stop it and have a look to find out what really
> > is
> > the case.
> > 
> > A exiftool-based script would be faster and (for me) easier, but what
> > should I
> > keep / remove exactly? And: the exiftool command I mentioned (see last
> > message) didn't change any date/time information, did it?
> > 
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > Best,
> > Bernd
> > 
> > On Sonntag, 22. April 2018 11:48:20 CEST Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > The jpeg file is a mess. The sidecar sound right.
> > > 
> > > I cannot recommend to drop date in image files, or at least to let few
> > > important one, especially in Exif, just in case where is plan to go back
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > > a workflow without sidecar.
> > > 
> > > Let's standard Exif time stamp and patch the tags with right value with
> > > your script. All other one can be dropped, as IPTC and XMP, as sidecar
> > > do
> > > the job instead.
> > > 
> > > Gilles Caulier
> > > 
> > > 2018-04-22 11:34 GMT+02:00 B.M. <b-misc at gmx.ch>:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you Gilles for your fast answer, can you maybe help me
> > 
> > understanding
> > 
> > > > the
> > > > second paragraph, I add some more data from a photo showing "wrong"
> > 
> > time
> > 
> > > > stamps:
> > > > 
> > > > $ exiftool DSC_0003.jpg | grep Date
> > > > File Modification Date/Time     : 2018:02:18 15:41:57+01:00
> > > > File Access Date/Time           : 2018:04:21 21:17:01+02:00
> > > > File Inode Change Date/Time     : 2018:02:18 15:45:03+01:00
> > > > Modify Date                     : 2001:01:01 01:21:57
> > > > Date/Time Original              : 2012:04:21 13:59:20
> > > > Create Date                     : 2012:04:21 13:59:20
> > > > Date Display Format             : D/M/Y
> > > > Profile Date Time               : 1998:02:09 06:49:00
> > > > Create Date                     : 2012:04:21 13:59:20.00
> > > > Date/Time Original              : 2012:04:21 13:59:20.00
> > > > Modify Date                     : 2001:01:01 01:21:57.00
> > > > 
> > > > $ grep Date DSC_0003.jpg.xmp
> > > > 
> > > >    xmp:CreateDate="2012-04-21T13:59:20"
> > > >    xmp:MetadataDate="2012-04-21T13:59:20"
> > > >    xmp:ModifyDate="2012-04-21T13:59:20"
> > > >    exif:DateTimeOriginal="2012-04-21T13:59:20.00"
> > > >    exif:DateTimeDigitized="2012-04-21T13:59:20.00"
> > > >    tiff:DateTime="2012-04-21T13:59:20.00"
> > > >    photoshop:DateCreated="2012-04-21">
> > > > 
> > > > So I don't see any inconsistencies in the metadata.
> > > > 
> > > > But I modified my image metadata (should be a cleanup) using a script
> > 
> > some
> > 
> > > > weeks ago and so I thought indeed that there might be a connection:
> > > > 
> > > > exiftool -XMP-digiKam:TagsList= -XMP-lr:HierarchicalSubject= -XMP-
> > > > microsoft:LastKeywordXMP= -IPTC:Keywords= -XMP-dc:Subject=
> > > > -overwrite_original
> > > > -r -ext jpg -ext JPG -ext jpeg -ext JPEG <my folders>
> > > > 
> > > > The idea for that command was a huge cleanup; since I switched to the
> > > > "write
> > > > to sidecar files only" option for some years now, I wanted to remove
> > 
> > all
> > 
> > > > self-
> > > > created metadata from the image files themselves, keep them only in
> > > > the
> > > > sidecar
> > > > files. Because otherwise I expected to get duplicate and potentially
> > 
> > non-
> > 
> > > > synchronized metadata.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you see anything?
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you very much.
> > > > 
> > > > Best,
> > > > Bernd
> > > > 
> > > > On Sonntag, 22. April 2018 10:49:54 CEST Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is an old behavior that i coded few years ago. There are many
> > 
> > many
> > 
> > > > > tags relevant of date time in Exif (and also IPTC and XMP)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Typically, i preserved a date time tags with "original" shot date
> > 
> > when
> > 
> > > > user
> > > > 
> > > > > patch a wrong time stamp in metadata, just in case. this one must
> > 
> > never
> > 
> > > > be
> > > > 
> > > > > used in DK database while scanning.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I currently working in 6.0.0 source code to review all metadata
> > 
> > engine
> > 
> > > > and
> > > > 
> > > > > i will drop this feature definitively as this can introduce side
> > > > > effects.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please report this problem in bugzilla (or look if one do not
> > > > > already
> > > > > exist), and comment inline.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Gilles Caulier
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2018-04-22 9:19 GMT+02:00 B.M. <b-misc at gmx.ch>:
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have a somehow strange problem: wrong Created Times are shown,
> > > > > > replicable,
> > > > > > but only for a certain user.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Since at least a week or so, digikam shows "wrong" times in
> > 
> > thumbnail
> > 
> > > > > > view,
> > > > > > which results in a wrong sorting.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > E.g. I have a picture which shows 02.03.12 01:00
> > > > > > The properties tab on the right shows Created 02.03.12 01:00
> > 
> > (wrong)
> > 
> > > > > > The metadata tab shows for EXIF:
> > > > > >   Date and Time 02.03.12 13:53:45 (correct)
> > > > > >   Date and Time (digitized) 02.03.12 13:53:45 (correct)
> > > > > >   Date and Time (original) 02.03.12 01:00:00 (wrong)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > for IPTC:
> > > > > >   Date Created 2012-03-02
> > > > > >   Digitization Date 2012-03-02
> > > > > >   Time Created 13:53:45+00:00 (correct)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Interestingly, if I look at my different album folders, not all
> > > > 
> > > > pictures
> > > > 
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > affected; in typical folders, about 30 - 60% show wrong times.
> > > > > > Most
> > > > > > folders
> > > > > > are affected, but not all.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The wrong times is 01:00:00 for most of the pictures, but 02:00:00
> > 
> > is
> > 
> > > > > > shown as
> > > > > > well, other times are not shown. It seem to be folder-specific,
> > 
> > i.e.
> > 
> > > > in a
> > > > 
> > > > > > certain album folder it's either 01:00:00 or 02:00:00.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If I rebuild digikam's databases (by renaming the old ones) I get
> > 
> > the
> > 
> > > > same
> > > > 
> > > > > > wrong times (especially the wrong one in the thumbnail view).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But if I copy the image (and its xmp sidecar file) to a new (test)
> > > > 
> > > > user on
> > > > 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > same machine and he imports it (new digikam setup), the correct
> > 
> > time
> > 
> > > > > > (13:53)
> > > > > > is shown for this different user.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I realized this behaviour about a week ago but didn't use digikam
> > 
> > for
> > 
> > > > some
> > > > 
> > > > > > weeks before. But I don't think this happened before (I'd noticed
> > 
> > it),
> > 
> > > > but
> > > > 
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > I look at different album folders I get the impression that and
> > > > 
> > > > increasing
> > > > 
> > > > > > number is affected. My system is Debian Stable, with digikam
> > > > > > 5.3.0.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If I check with exiftool, I correctly get
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   Date/Time Original              : 2012:03:02 13:53:45
> > > > > >   Sub Sec Time Original           : 00
> > > > > >   Date/Time Original              : 2012:03:02 13:53:45.00
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > (but why is it reported twice?)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > All files are on the same disk.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > What could be the reason for this weird behavior? Thank you for
> > 
> > your
> > 
> > > > > > support!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > No, I didn't drink too much beer or wine for the current high
> > > > 
> > > > temperatures
> > > > 
> > > > > > here in continental Europe...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Bernd





More information about the Digikam-users mailing list