[digiKam-users] The future of 6.0.0 bundles and C++11 support...

[Andrey Goreev]

Thanks Gilles!
I will give it a try for sure.I want to test the import function specifically.
Hopefully video files' dates will be recognized correctly. 
If the import works I won't need Rapid Photo Downloader anymore.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> Date: 2018-04-02  8:01 AM  (GMT-07:00) To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <digikam-users at kde.org> Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] The future of 6.0.0 bundles and C++11 support... 
Hi all,
Done : https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384807
Now ffmpeg 3.3.6 is integrated in Linux AppImage 64 bits for incoming 6.0.0 release.
The new beta AppImage 6.0.0 will be available soon at usual place. 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/41139912022/in/dateposted/

Take a care to use it : it's really a beta, do not use yet in production !!!!
Best
Gilles Caulier
2018-04-02 9:08 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
Hi all, 
Yesterday evening, i tried to build 6.0.0 AppImage under CentoS 6.9 in 64 bits. I forget another piece which increase the compilation complexity : ffmpeg.
digiKam require ffmpeg 3.x. Centos has no ffmpeg rpm officially, excepted one contrib repo in Romania with a 2.x release outdated.
We have already a file in bugzilla to build digiKam +qtAv with a recent ffmpeg, in goal to be able to manage recent video containers as H265. So i must add rules to compile ffmpeg myself in the bundle, and it's a complex task. I cannot use static ffmpeg build here, as i need shared libs.
So, no way to build 32 bits AppImage bundles for the future...
Gilles Caulier
2018-04-02 8:30 GMT+02:00 jdd at dodin.org <jdd at dodin.org>:
Le 02/04/2018 à 08:23, Remco Viëtor a écrit :




And as Gilles remarked, you can always switch to compiling Digikam yourself.

Though that can get progressively more difficult if the distributions start

phasing out otherwise unused libraries Digikam needs.






chance are any 32 bits distro will have digikam. Only the appimage may be more difficult to find, but brand new functions often ask more of the hardware so needs more recent computer



on openSUSE, Tumbleweed is still proposed with 32 bits (although this may not be for anybody)



jdd





-- 

http://dodin.org





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20180402/61f796ca/attachment.html>