Exiv2 bug reports
NeiNei
neinei at gmx.net
Thu Mar 30 10:23:04 BST 2017
Hi Gilles,
just wanted to get back on the question of the suitability of the C++
Interface for ExifTool for DigiKam. Perhaps you have found some time
already to take a look at it?
Best,
NeiNei
On 11.03.2017 18:59, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Effectively, it's interesting. I will take a look...
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2017-03-11 18:09 GMT+01:00 Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com
> <mailto:aegoreev at gmail.com>>:
>
> Can this help ?
>
> http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/cpp_exiftool/
> <http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/cpp_exiftool/>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com
> <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>
> Date: 2017-03-11 9:17 AM (GMT-07:00)
> To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with
> the power of open source <digikam-users at kde.org
> <mailto:digikam-users at kde.org>>
> Subject: Re: Exiv2 bug reports
>
>
>
> 2017-03-11 16:48 GMT+01:00 Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com
> <mailto:aegoreev at gmail.com>>:
>
> What tool is creating xmp sidecar files for the video files at
> the moment? Exiv2 ?
>
>
> yes
>
>
>
> But anyways, there has to be something else in the FOSS world
> that can handle the job.
>
> Video format is just too different from the image format so it
> is tough to find a tool that can handle both very well. Exiftool
> came pretty close to that but it still lacks of ability to write
> many of tags.
>
>
> Exiftool is perl based, not C++
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list