Exiv2 bug reports

NeiNei neinei at gmx.net
Thu Mar 30 10:23:04 BST 2017


Hi Gilles,

just wanted to get back on the question of the suitability of the C++ 
Interface for ExifTool for DigiKam. Perhaps you have found some time 
already to take a look at it?

Best,
NeiNei

On 11.03.2017 18:59, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Effectively, it's interesting. I will take a look...
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2017-03-11 18:09 GMT+01:00 Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com
> <mailto:aegoreev at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Can this help ?
>
>     http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/cpp_exiftool/
>     <http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/cpp_exiftool/>
>
>
>     Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
>     -------- Original message --------
>     From: Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com
>     <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>
>     Date: 2017-03-11 9:17 AM (GMT-07:00)
>     To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with
>     the power of open source <digikam-users at kde.org
>     <mailto:digikam-users at kde.org>>
>     Subject: Re: Exiv2 bug reports
>
>
>
>     2017-03-11 16:48 GMT+01:00 Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com
>     <mailto:aegoreev at gmail.com>>:
>
>         What tool is creating xmp sidecar files for the video files at
>         the moment? Exiv2 ?
>
>
>     yes
>
>
>
>         But anyways, there has to be something else in the FOSS world
>         that can handle the job.
>
>         Video format is just too different from the image format so it
>         is tough to find a tool that can handle both very well. Exiftool
>         came pretty close to that but it still lacks of ability to write
>         many of tags.
>
>
>     Exiftool is perl based, not C++
>
>     Gilles Caulier
>
>




More information about the Digikam-users mailing list