Digikam raw files and darktable
Juan Jose Casafranca
jjcasmar at gmail.com
Sun Jan 15 16:17:22 GMT 2017
Okay, I understand what you mean.
But a thumbnail may be in BW for example, and that is completely different
from a color version. The raw file shows the color version because that is
the embedded image. In the raw processor you turn it into BW and the
thumbnail remains colored. I dont feel that is the correct behavior for a
thumbnail... in fact, in that case, is completely useless because the image
is completely different from what the thumbnail is showing.
2017-01-15 17:13 GMT+01:00 jdd <jdd at dodin.org>:
> Le 15/01/2017 à 17:10, Juan Jose Casafranca a écrit :
>
>> Yes it can, I have already done it. You only need to call the raw
>> processor and ask for the developed image.
>>
>
> You don't understand what I mean. A thunmnail is a very small jpg, with
> much compression, so it wont be able to show what the final image is, apart
> from very basic content
>
> The issue is to know when the thumbnail must be updated, as the raw file
>> is not changed, but the xmp file, and DK schedules updates when the
>> image file has changed.
>>
>> 2017-01-15 17:06 GMT+01:00 jdd <jdd at dodin.org <mailto:jdd at dodin.org>>:
>>
>> Le 15/01/2017 à 17:01, Juan José Casafranca a écrit :
>>
>> misunderstood this whole point. I want the raw thumbnail to show
>> how the image
>> is currently based in the development you have done in the raw
>> processor.
>>
>>
>> don't know if a thumbnail can achieve this :-(
>>
>> jdd
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170115/bbfbe61f/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list