Digikam raw files and darktable

[Juan Jose Casafranca]

I havent thought it that way since Ive always use nikon cameras, but ypu
may be right.

Anyway, as I said, lets try to hace a working concept for a global raw
processor and after that, think about other necessities.

This weekend Ill begin to study DK code to try to find a way of
implementing this feature.

Thanks for the tips :-)

El 13 ene. 2017 11:57 PM, "cerp" <cerp at eeos.biz> escribió:

Dear Juan,

I am not sure people use always the same editor. People may have more than
one camera using different RAW format, and you tend to use the best RAW
editor for the specific format. For example, we use a combination of
editors. Even proprietary software we have used CaptureOne, Lightroom and
Silkypix, depending on the camera (CaptureOne and Lightroom for the Leica,
Silkypix for the RAF).

This is even more true in the OS environment.


Best,

Quoting Juan Jose Casafranca <jjcasmar at gmail.com>:

More or less. I prefer to think that the user has defined a default raw
> processor (normally, users only use one raw processor, dont they?) and all
> the raw files will be decoded using that raw processor in order to generate
> the thumbnail and preview image. When the user opens that file, it will be
> opened in the default raw processor and after the edition is done,
> thumbnail will be updated accordingly.
>
> Maybe allowing the user to select a specific raw processor for a specific
> raw file can be done, but lets do things one step at a time. The original
> idea is already hard for me, as I've never worked neither with digikam code
> nor any other raw processor but DT.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170114/f13075b7/attachment.html>