Problem with deleting and labelling JPG and RAW

[Simon Frei]

What is convoluted?
If it is having to group them manually, that could be solved by an
option on import to group by name. That would be a very useful feature
indeed. There is already a more broad feature request about grouping on
import: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121310

On 13/01/17 17:23, cerp wrote:
> It does work, but it seems a bit convoluted .... it is quite standard
> behaviour that is used for DAM, I believe.
>
> Best,
>
>
> Quoting Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Cerp 
>> Please take a look here:
>> https://discuss.pixls.us/t/culling-process-in-digikam/3000/5
>> Hopefully it works.
>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>> -------- Original message --------From: cerp <cerp at eeos.biz> Date:
>> 2017-01-13  8:56 AM  (GMT-07:00) To: digiKam - Home Manage your
>> photographs as a professional with the power of open source
>> <digikam-users at kde.org> Subject: Problem with deleting and labelling
>> JPG and RAW
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We use digikam to manage our photographic assets.
>>
>> One issue we have is that when we are on an assignment we normally 
>> shoot RAW + JPG, like most photographers.
>>
>> When we go back, we then download photographs from the camera in a 
>> buffer disk, we first look quickly at the JPG to decide quickly which 
>> one to keep and which ones to throw away, then we take the one we keep 
>> and we categorise them (with labels) work on the RAW to obtain exactly 
>> the cuts and feel we need, then we move everything to archive.
>>
>> One of the two big problems we have is that when we scan the JPG to 
>> decide what to keep and what to throw away, deleting the JPG does not 
>> delete the RAW, and marking the JPG does not automatically mark the 
>> RAW, so you haev to carry out every operation twice, which requires 
>> twice as much time. That is a huge problem.
>>
>> How do we solve it?
>>
>> PS: Separate email for the other problem.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Corrado & Rina
>
>
>