Digikam raw files and darktable

[Juan Jose Casafranca]

That is not even close to want I want. What I want is the raw thumbnail to
be updated...

If I have 20 similar raw files, and I decided one of them is the perfect
one and I process it, I want its thumbnail in DK to be updated so when I
see my 20 files in DK, I know which one is the one I was processing. Maybe
with 1 processed file is not a huge gain, but imagine I process the 20 of
them, one to BW, one to other thing... Now I want to open the one I
processed in BW low contrast... how do I know which one is it? Visual
reference is better than tags for this...

2017-01-07 16:39 GMT+01:00 Remco Viëtor <remco.vietor at wanadoo.fr>:

> On samedi 7 janvier 2017 15:41:25 CET Juan Jose Casafranca wrote:
> (...)
> >
> > And of course DK is not DT. But if you want to target photographers,
> maybe
> > its a good idea to consider how photographers work. They need a way to
> > organize their library, which DK is good at, and a way to process raw
> > files, which DT is good at (DK is not a good raw processor and DT is not
> > good for library management). But if it's not possible to use DK to
> > organize raw files with thumbnails preview for processed imaged... then
> is
> > useless for managing a raw library.
>
> Well, one way to get what you want is to "export" the images you developed
> in
> DT to the same folder as where the RAW files are stored. In that way, the
> current versions of Digikam will take care of generating the thumbnails and
> store them, without any change in how either program works.
>
> And digikam will still have one image file or video per thumbnail stored.
> And
> grouping on extension should still work as well.
>
> Remco
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170107/f8e032f7/attachment.html>