Bug 378364 - Sequence number options appear to be ignored when sequence number specified as "###"

[Tom Cunningham]

Is this syntax OK for the custom rename during import?

[date:yyyy-MM-dd] ###[f,1,3].[ext]{lower}

I don't get a step of 3 and the sequence number does not start over
when the folder changes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20170402/1b6ddbd4/attachment.html>