[Digikam-users] missing thumbnails - database cleanup???
Daniel Bauer
linux at daniel-bauer.com
Tue Jan 6 18:06:55 GMT 2015
Hello Gilles
happy new year!
I guess you told me this, so that you will not see me on this list
anymore in the next 248 years while I'm waiting that the thumbnails are
rebuilt :-)
However, I gave it a try, renamed the thumbnails-digikam.db, started
digikam, went to that folder with the two missing images - all thumbs
were rebuilt, /except the missing two/...
So, this wouldn't help...
What else can it be?
Am 06.01.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Just to try, rename thumbnails-digikam.db database file and restart digiKam.
>
> There is nothing important in this database. It store thumbnail with
> wavelets compression. It's a cache.
>
> You will need of course to rebuild thumbnails after.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2015-01-06 16:13 GMT+01:00 Daniel Bauer <linux at daniel-bauer.com>:
>> Am 06.01.2015 um 15:25 schrieb Daniel Bauer:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> from time to time digikam refuses to show thumbnails in the album view
>>> for some images. No idea why...
>>>
>>> Searching google I found that it might bbe nessesary to cleanup the
>>> databases. As I always have a lot of changes I can imagine...
>>>
>>> But I cannot find the cleanup_digikamdb.1 program as an rpm for
>>> opensuse. Big brother google doesn't help me, of course.
>>>
>>> Any hints?
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>> digikam 3.2.0
>>> sqlite db
>>>
>>> (ps: I even copied the missing image again under a new name, it is still
>>> not shown...)
>>
>>
>>
>> I updated to digikam 4.6.0, no change
>> I run
>> sqlite3 -line digikam4.db 'pragma integrity_check;' and
>> sqlite3 -line thumbnails-digikam.db 'pragma integrity_check;'
>> no errors
>> sqlite3 -line digikam4.db 'vacuum;'
>> reduced size about 50%
>> sqlite3 -line thumbnails-digikam.db 'vacuum;'
>> no vivible change in file size
>>
>> however the thumbs of those images are still not shown.
>>
>> There must be something in those images that digikam does not like (although
>> they were produced with digikams batch tool). They wouldn't be shown in any
>> other folder, no matter if I rename them. But when I open the fiole with
>> gewenview and save a new copy, it is immediately shown...
>>
>> I can send such an image to a developper, but not publish it...
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Barcelona
>> http://www.daniel-bauer.com
>> room in Barcelona: https://www.airbnb.es/rooms/2416137
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
--
Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Barcelona
http://www.daniel-bauer.com
room in Barcelona: https://www.airbnb.es/rooms/2416137
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list