[Digikam-users] Easy downgrade?

[Anders Stedtlund]

It does not work for me on openSUSE either. I have the same problem. I
build from source so I can easily have multiple installations though.

I still use 3.5 for most of my work, I only use 4.2 to download images.
Den 5 sep 2014 22:15 skrev "Wilkins, Vern W" <vwilkins at indiana.edu>:

>    I've been tempted to downgrade because 4.2 still doesn't work right on
> fedora.  I've submitted bugs since 4.1 but I think they believe 4.2 fixed
> the problem.  The trouble I still have is in editing mode, not being able
> to see the image at the correct size after resizing.  Seems the resized
> image is always scaled to the original size, which makes things like
> sharpening impossible.  Changing the %view to anything doesn't work
> right...basically same bug that was first reported with 4.0 that seems to
> be lingering forever but in this case it's probably fedora developers
> because they did something to get around having to update so many
> dependencies, especially opencv.
>
>
>
> ------ Original message------
>
> *From: *Remco Viëtor
>
> *Date: *Thu, Sep 4, 2014 1:28 AM
>
> *To: *digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the
> power of open source;
>
> *Subject:*Re: [Digikam-users] Easy downgrade?
>
>
>   On Thursday 04 September 2014 00:37:53
> digikamusers.postfach144 at neverbox.com wrote:
> > Thank you for your quick reply, Gilles!
> >
> > The short answer: Many things got slower, and I'm experiencing
> > quite a lot of new bugs in old features that hold me from getting
> > things done. My quick temporary solution is to downgrade.
> >
> > I deliberately didn't give a reason, because I feared this short,
> > unfocussed version could be misinterpreted as a rant about digiKam, its
> > developers, and life in general. ;-) But it's just my lacking the time
> > right now to handle FLOSS bugs as they should be handled. I hope I'll
> > find the time to come back to the concrete points. Thank you so far for
> > a great piece of software.
> >
> > Holger
> >
> >
> > "Gilles Caulier - caulier.gilles at gmail.com"
> > <digikamusers.postfach144.3d1ea0e90c.caulier.gilles#gmail.com at ob.0sg.net
> >
> > schrieb:
> >
> > > No. DB schema has not changed with 4.2.0. You can downgrade safety.
> > >
> > > Just by curiosity : why to downgrade ?
> > >
>  Just remember to also downgrade the KIPI plugins, or you could get some
> surprises (I hit an undefined symbol in Geolocation with Digikam 3.5 and
> KIPI 4.2...)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20140906/8de4526e/attachment.html>