[Digikam-users] 4.x view size bug

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Sun Nov 23 15:12:11 GMT 2014


Anders,

Can you identify is another is solved with this patch :

https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Digikam/CodingSprint2014#Image_Editor_Model.2FView_Fixes_and_Finalization

Gilles

2014-11-23 16:09 GMT+01:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
> And it's getting better and better it seems. Without this patch I had
> problems with manual selection in some scenarios, e.g. not cutting to
> selection after a rotation, but that's not a problem with the patch.
>
> /Anders
>
> 2014-11-23 10:57 GMT+01:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>> perfect. I can close file as solved for next 4.6.0...
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2014-11-23 8:09 GMT+01:00 Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>:
>>> FYI
>>>
>>> I have just now tested the latest patch in this bug report:
>>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335661
>>>
>>> I applied it on digiKam 4.5.0 and it works for me. It also seems to
>>> solve the problem I have had with before/after preview on e.g.
>>> sharpening and local contrast tools.
>>>
>>> /Anders
>>>
>>> 2014-09-29 14:50 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>>> Dk 4.x is still very confused wrt image zoom, also in the editor tools.
>>>>
>>>> Anders
>>>>
>>>> Mandag den 29. september 2014 12:40:44 skrev Wilkins, Vern W:
>>>>> Are people still having the problem reported early with 4.x, where after
>>>>> resizing the image, it can never be viewed at the correct percentage (it's
>>>>> always scaled and looks terrible), until the image is saved and re-opened?
>>>>> I kept seeing how this was supposed to be fixed in each new version, and
>>>>> I'm still having the same problem with 4.3 on Fedora.
>>>>>
>>>>> I saw some mention that this was related to a particular opencv issue, but
>>>>> it doesn't make sense that this would be mentioned in the Digikam
>>>>> changelog, if it was actually an opencv issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm just trying to figure out if this continues to be something with the
>>>>> Fedora build, if it's a Digikam problem, or if it's some bad setting that
>>>>> is carrying over from version to version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Vern
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users



More information about the Digikam-users mailing list