falolaf at gmail.com
Sat May 24 12:03:44 BST 2014
2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> > > On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > >> There is an important setup to check on your computer.
> > >>
> > >> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam when you use
> > >> exotic widget style with KDE application
> > >>
> > >> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used Oxygen style
> > >> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is fine.
> > >>
> > >> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget style.
> > >> This can introduce problems...
> > >
> > > I use QtCurve, is that exotic?
> > If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing list.
> > Change widget style from digiKam config panel through MISC Settings
> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews, or the
> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius parameter in the
> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use oxygen...
Switching style has no effect in my setup!
In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing happens.
And I have tested even more now and it always problems with images that has
been resized and it always works on images with original size.
Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Digikam-users