[Digikam-users] Digikam on Kubuntu Trusty

[Philippe Clérié]

Thanks for both answers.

Patience may be in order here. So maybe I'll wait a few days....

Best

-- 
Philippe

------
The trouble with common sense it that it is so uncommon.
<Anonymous>


On 05/12/2014 04:41 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> A lots of amount of crashes have been reported recently due to a bug
> introduced in... sqlite.
>
> Updating this external component, including QtSqlite plugin solve the
> problem. Look this UPSTREAM file from bugzilla for details :
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329697
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-05-12 22:26 GMT+02:00 kaefert at gmail.com <kaefert at gmail.com>:
>> Well. I guess you could say it like that:
>> Digikam is the most feature rich open-source photo management
>> software, but sadly it's not the most stable one.
>> (I've also experienced numerous bugs & crashes with 3.5 and 4.0.0
>> beta4 which are the two versions I've tried up to now)
>>
>> Regards, Thomas K.
>>
>> 2014-05-12 22:20 GMT+02:00 Philippe Clérié <philippe at gcal.net>:
>>> I am getting pretty discouraged with Digikam on Kubuntu. 3.3 from
>>> precise-Kubuntu-backports was unusable: most editing functions I use simply
>>> did not work. Ï have upgraded to Trusty (digikam 3.5) last week. While the
>>> editing functions are now back to normal, I am experiencing numerous
>>> crashes: I have not been able to keep digikam open for an hour at a time.
>>>
>>> At the moment I have not identified a pattern. I have had crashes:
>>>
>>> - while changing from one album to another;
>>> - while applying tags to 3 to 6 photos at a time;
>>> - while approving edits in the editor;
>>> - while saving to new file after edits;
>>> - while returning from the editor.
>>>
>>> However, a cursory look at the bug trackers don't show anything I could
>>> quickly identify with. So maybe I am experiencing a local issue.
>>>
>>> I have not tried any other distribution. I just don't see why, say Fedora,
>>> would package a version that does not crash as much. It's the same source
>>> code. Right?
>>>
>>> Anyway, I was wondering if there are others seeing this sort of thing or
>>> whether I am all alone out there?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> --
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> ------
>>> The trouble with common sense it that it is so uncommon.
>>> <Anonymous>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>