[Digikam-users] A modern auto-fix?

[Carl McGrath]

Paul
Experiment with the Local Contrast tool a bit - I find that using just 
Stage 1, Power = 25 and Blur 80 gives a pleasing result, but you may 
have different preferences.

Note that you can use the Batch Queue Manager to apply the LC tool to 
several pictures at once.
I frequently find that a group of pictures taken under the same 
conditions, e.g. a day at the park, are easily improved with Batch - 
Local Contrast.
I also will frequently run the Sharpen tool as well.

Not quite one-touch, but very powerful and relatively easy to use.

On 05/10/2014 12:46 PM, Paul Verizzo wrote:
> Thanks, I didn't catch that, I'll look into it.
>
> Nevertheless, wouldn't something as I described, a one touch fix, be 
> wonderful?  Not that I can write a damned bit of code, so beggars 
> can't be choosers as we say over here.  (USA)
>
> Paul
>
> On 5/10/2014 12:11 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>> digiKam has LocalContrast tool which make the same correction to
>> image. In fact it emulate pseudo HDR rendering.
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2014-05-10 18:07 GMT+02:00 Paul Verizzo<paulv at paulv.net>:
>>> Background:  I've been in digital photography since 2000, decades of film
>>> before and since.  I'm certainly familiar with the use of curves to correct
>>> bad photos.  But so tedious, and if the photos are snapshots, hard to
>>> justify the time.  It appears to me, although I can't prove it, that digital
>>> cameras, discrete or within phones, seem to be doing a much better job
>>> automatically adjusting curves than my old Minolta A2, for instance.
>>>
>>> I recently became aware of a new free Canon program, My Image Garden, that
>>> has a much improved Auto-fix than its forerunner.  As an example, a backlit
>>> photo processed in MIG will bring up only the shadows while leaving the
>>> normal and highlights alone.  It allegedly uses a zone by zone analysis.  It
>>> is a terrible program in every other regard, clunky interface, bloated, etc.
>>> But I used it for some recent pics to advantage.
>>>
>>> Some of those pictures were originally on my Windows Phone 8, which I had
>>> copied to the HD.  Before I deleted them from the phone, I poked around with
>>> the options at that point.  I found an auto-fix, pushed the "button," and my
>>> jaw dropped.  Literally.  A very dark, underexposed shot made perfect!  This
>>> feature is within the Nokia programs!  It is so good, I can see myself
>>> transferring photos from other sources into the phone for correction!  And
>>> it's fast, even so.
>>>
>>> I went back through the digiKam manual and looked on screen, and I see the
>>> old standbys there, but nothing like what I've experienced with the above.
>>> Oh, upon lots of research, I found a 2007 $40 program called Photoright that
>>> upon test, seems to be doing similar zone adjustments.
>>>
>>> Bottom lines:  Are my observations valid?  Do you think DK might get
>>> something like this?  Oh, yes, all Windows although MIG is available for
>>> Mac.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Paul Verizzo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20140510/8d45b60d/attachment.html>