[Digikam-users] Digikam packaged for MacOS (dmg or alike)
alobolistas at gmail.com
Fri May 9 19:05:41 BST 2014
Using the Macports is what I did and took for hours. Not looking
forward to do it again in the future...
I think that, under these circumstances, stating that Digikam is
available for MacOS is
a bit misleading. For 99% of Mac users, Digikam is not really
available. The answer to
"Is Digikam available for Mac OSX?" should be "Not without hours of
work on the installation"
I regret it, many people would use Digikam on Mac if a dmg or pkg
based installation was available.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:28 PM, J Albrecht <heviiguy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ooops! Sorry: I just realised that I had indeed installed it via Macports. But hey, considering the difficulties and utter frustration that I had faced when I first tried to install Digikam on Ubuntu a couple of years ago, this was a piece of cake!
> On 09 May 2014, at 14:07, J Albrecht <heviiguy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can’t recall where I had picked it up from but, I’m running a copy of Digikam 3.5 beta from a dmg file. Seems to work without any problems under Mavericks 10.9 on my MBPr
>> On 09 May 2014, at 13:13, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2014-05-09 12:22 GMT+02:00 Agustin Lobo <alobolistas at gmail.com>:
>>>> Is there any binary release of Digikam packaged for MacOSX as a dmg
>>>> file (or alike) foreseen?
>>>> Anybody working on this?
>>>> I find the suggested Macports installation too involved for the
>>>> average Mac user.
>>> Well, i would to found somebody able to do it. It's not a simple task
>>> that could be delegate to a student for ex.
>>> Macports provide also a way to make a dmg from a fresh install, but
>>> last time that i do it, compilation cannot be completed...
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
More information about the Digikam-users