[Digikam-users] digikam 4.1 bugs
anders at alweb.dk
Mon Jul 21 21:02:35 BST 2014
On Mandag den 21. juli 2014 18:19:52, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> 2014-07-21 16:07 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> > Hi,
> > I finally got an update to digikam 4.1, and it feels fast and nice.
> > However, within the editor, some bugs resist, notacibly the problem with
> > preview sizes seems to persist.'
> > This problem is very odd, it does not affect all tools, and the behavior
> > is not consistent, sometimes the order of tools used affects the
> > behavior.
> > After conversion from RAW, using the curve tool, the initial preview is
> > missized, on my screen it is set to 12%, which may be the preview size in
> > the album view, with two sidebars visible.
> > In my opinion, if the size in the editor is "fit to window size", this
> > setting should be sticky when activating tools (whatever setting in the
> > editor window should stick, in fact).
> It must and it work as expected here.
Well, it does not here. Several tools shows a wrong size initially. Some
corrects the size after a moment, some does not, some inflicts the wrong size
on the main editor window. Sometimes, as said, the displayed size depends on
order of tools.
How can this depend on signals and slots??? Doesn't it just get the size from
the main editor window?
Right now, my editor window claims that a "fit to window" image is at 14%, but
the editor tools still appears to prefer 12%. Can some configuration value
> I suspect a race condition with signals and slots when code if compile
> in final release. I supose that you install digiKam using a
> pre-compiled package. Right ?
I'm using chakra packages compiled against kde 4.13.2 "optimized by the chakra
> Here, i'm in full debug mode, which introduce some small time
> latencies. which is enough to mask this kind of problem.
> > Another problem is with the preview of the effect of a tool. I use
> > consequently "mouse over" type preview, and Since 4.0, I have to move the
> > mouse into the preview and out again to see the preview, which was not
> > the case in 3.6 - a regression :0
> Yes, fully reproducible here. I use always this mode. It's in my TODO list.
Wonderful, I look forward to seing that one go away :-)
> > Let me know, if I should rather file explicit bugs than explaining here!
> Look how is compile digiKam. Go to help/About dialog.
> Gilles Caulier
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
More information about the Digikam-users