[Digikam-users] Image quality sorter broken?

[Andreas Mair]

Hi,

I've been trying to find out how to use the Image Quality Sorter since
4.0.0-beta3 but I've never found out how it works.
I've now tried again using digiKam 4.1.0 and OpenCV 2.4.9 (if that
matters), but still can't see any result.

Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
I open the maintenance tool, tick "Whole album collection", set "Scan
mode" to "Clean all and re-scan", settings are at the defaults. It
takes some time while the tool is processing the images. After that I
try to find any image that has a label using the "Filters" sidebar but
I can't find a single one.

Any ideas or howtos?

Best regards,
Andreas



2014-07-01 22:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <robert at susmilch.com>:
> I have OpenCV 2.4.9 installed from source since the git version. Face
> detection worked in all digikam versions 4.0.0 and git, trying 4.1.0 now.
> It never seemed to recognize faces and auto tag them even though I had 200+
> of my 18 month old son tagged, think last I heard it was broken.
>
> I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I tried
> it on a small album, nothing...
> Facial recognition automatic tagging broken still (since you brought up
> libkface?)
>
> Robert
>
>
> On 07/01/2014 02:58 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> i'm sure that nothing has changed in this part since 4.0.0
>>
>> The only dependency used by this tool is OpenCV. digiKam 4.1.0 now
>> require OpenCV 2.4.9 to be sure that libkface do not crash. Perhaps
>> the problem is here...
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2014-07-01 21:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <robert at susmilch.com>:
>>>
>>> Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
>>> version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non of
>>> these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign Rejected,
>>> etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but after waiting
>>> for
>>> image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has changed.  I am using
>>> the
>>> default settings, am I doing something wrong or is it truly that broken?
>>>
>>> Robert
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users