[Digikam-users] How to move a digikam collection
Thomas
thomasdn at gmail.com
Sat Jul 28 14:36:49 BST 2012
2012/6/25 Jean-François Rabasse <jean-francois.rabasse at wanadoo.fr>
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Thomas wrote:
>> So, now my question is, how do I get this all up and running again
>> with the collection in the new location and digikam on a new computer?
>>
>> I see that the SQL dump of digikam4.db has this line:
>> INSERT INTO "AlbumRoots"
>> VALUES(8,'photos',0,1,'volumeid:?path=%2Fphotodisk%2Ftdn-photos%2Fphotos','/');
>>
>> Should I just change this to:
>> INSERT INTO "AlbumRoots"
>> VALUES(8,'photos',0,1,'volumeid:?path=%2Fnet%2Fphoto%2Fphotos','/');
>> And then restore the digikam db?
>
>
> Seems good. That kind of tweak works for me, I have similar problems
> when replicating (rsync) DK database between two computers, a desktop
> and a laptop, and yes, I have to change the path of the collection
> base directory.
> A simple command line SQL command can do "UPDATE TABLE ... " etc.
>
> One more thing you should check is the location of your DB file, the
> digikam4.db, because it's stored into the DK runtime configuration
> file, $HOME/.kde4/share/config/digikamrc
> If your DB file is stored at the root of your collection, you'll
> also have to change the "Database Name=" parameter from, e.g.
> /photodisk/photos to /net/photo/photos, so that DK can find your new DB upon next startup.
>
> And if your DB file is on your local computer, not on a USB drive or
> network drive, of course nothing to change in rc configuration.
My DB is on my local computer in ~/Pictures/digikam4.db
I have now tried from a local file system instead of NFS/NAS.
I still get this error from digikam:
digikam(28701)/digikam (core)
Digikam::DatabaseCoreBackendPrivate::checkRetrySQLiteLockError:
Detected locked database file. There is an active transaction. Waited
but giving up now.
Please, is there any way I can just recover all my digikam tags from
the DB, so that I can import them into a new digikam DB?
This stuff needs to be robust. It takes huge amounts of work to tag so
many photos. We cannot let users lose important data like this.
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list