[Digikam-users] Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

[Antonio Trincone]

If I may suggest Philip after Gilles message it will be reasonable to wait
for final releases, specially in this case, instead of betas
antonio

2012/2/6 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>

> Hi all,
>
> I don't yet posted the release announce. But take a care, this
> 2.6.0-beta1 is not ready to use in production. Only use it for test
> purpose. There are few parts probably broken in this release. I will
> explain it in announcement.
>
> Best
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2012/2/6 Philip Johnsson <philip.johnsson at gmail.com>:
> > As Digikam 2.6.0 beta1 is just out as source code tarball I was
> > wondering if you guys want betas on my PPA or should I wait for finals
> > to upload? I will not (I think) maintain stable and betas in some
> > separate packages solutions. What do you guys think?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Philip
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>



-- 
--
Antonio Trincone
http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone
http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/
http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/
http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home
http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20120206/dd4c8b8b/attachment.html>