[Digikam-users] panorama tool
sleepless
sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl
Mon Sep 19 18:48:12 BST 2011
The first thing I notice is that it works perfectly well if I convert
them to DNG.
At some point I have seen a message about filezise inconsistency. NEF
file reports 3038x2014 DNG says 3039x2014.
Would like to hear some thoughts about that.
Rinus
Op 19-09-11 19:32, Antonio Trincone schreef:
> After few private mails with Rinus I prepared a zip files with new
> examples for malfunctioning of panorama tool. In this one the program
> answered with error messages which are included in the zip file that
> can be downloaded (ca. 20 Mb) in the link below if you are interested.
> thank you for help
> antonio
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *sleepless* <sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl
> <mailto:sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl>>
> Date: 2011/9/19
> Subject: Re: Fwd: source files
> To: Antonio Trincone <antonio.trincone at gmail.com
> <mailto:antonio.trincone at gmail.com>>
>
>
> Op 19-09-11 18:04, Antonio Trincone schreef:
>> I prepared a zip file with 4 nef from Nikon D70. The additional two
>> files are screen capture of the error messages obtained during the
>> process. The file is downloadable here:
>> http://zen.na.icb.cnr.it/roundabout/plugins/utility/content/dfh/download.php?file=88820100501_104903.NEF.zip
> All downloaded without problem. The text output points into direction
> problem with to much overlap, I had already a little suspician in that
> direction, that this might confuse the software somehow. That´s a fine
> starting point for further investigation.
>
> You can send this remark of mine with the link to ml if you want.
>
> Thank for cooperation.
> Best,
> Rinus
>
>>
>>
>> best
>> Antonio
>>
>> PS notice I used these files time ago with a Window program (do not
>> remember the name) to stich a panorama and the result is here:
>>
>> https://picasaweb.google.com/108470239770597604472/2010#5654097747984093426
>>
>> Please let me know if download works so I can send the url to ML too
>> for info useful for others.
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/19 sleepless <sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl
>> <mailto:sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl>>
>>
>> Antonio,
>>
>>
>> Op 19-09-11 16:13, Antonio Trincone schreef:
>>> Hi Rinus
>>> to me is not a problem of copyright at all. I am an amateur
>>> photographer and do not mind about this. Happy you enjoy them
>>> and sharing with you. No problem.
>>>
>>> I used raw for other examples of other panorama. At first with
>>> error just occurred I tried to transform first raw to PNG and
>>> then used PNG but with different examples.
>>>
>>> During signalling of the problem to ML I choose to communicate
>>> the problem with the examples where I used jpg files as originals.
>> ok, than there is no need to send raw files here.
>>
>>> However as you know these files produced a good result with
>>> Digikam 2.1.0 and a bad one with Digikam 2.1.1, same with other
>>> examples.
>>> I have to choose raw or PNG at home if you want other originals
>>> and I could send them to you.
>>> However last experience yesterday with two or three old NEF
>>> files: I tried to stich and I got error messages from the
>>> wizard. Probably I could repeat it and try to copy (if possible)
>>> the long text of the error if it could be useful for you
>>> programmers.
>> that could be useful, the pictures and the output. If you want to
>> go that far for it, I will be happy see what happens here.
>>
>>
>> I should probably not say this, and it is strictly confidential
>> but programmers (I do not speak for Benjamin, I don´t know him)
>> are just so happy if they can say: ¨not reproducible¨, that means
>> for them that there is no problem with the code, but the reality
>> is far less simple.
>>
>> I am not a ¨real¨ programmer, I track them down those nasty bugs
>> (it´s sort of brain game to me) but even then the obvious
>> encounters denials sometimes.
>>
>>>
>>> The photos are taken where I live in Pozzuoli near Naples
>>> (searching in Google maps for Pozzuoli Solfatara you can get it
>>> by street view).
>>> Therefore that's not a lake it is Tirrenian sea.
>> I have been there, unfortunately 35 years ago, I would love to
>> see it again.
>> Best regards,
>> Rinus
>>
>>>
>>> all the best
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> 2011/9/19 sleepless <sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl
>>> <mailto:sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the pictures.
>>> Btw. I suppose they are taken in your beautiful country.
>>> Which lake do we see here? This summer I was at lago
>>> Maggiore. Have been at most of the others too.
>>>
>>> But you wrote this before:
>>> I check jpg output starting either with RAW files or png files.
>>>
>>> So, you did not send the originals I suppose. I don´t even
>>> know if it is possible to send 10MB+ pictures by mail, but
>>> in my opinion it matters in reproducibillty of the problem.
>>>
>>> It is a beautifull picture and I can imagine that you
>>> hesitate to share it but I can assure you 100%+ that you
>>> send them strictly private and I will destroy them after
>>> testing.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Rinus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Op 19-09-11 14:35, Antonio Trincone schreef:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: *Antonio Trincone* <antonio.trincone at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:antonio.trincone at gmail.com>>
>>>> Date: 2011/9/18
>>>> Subject: source files
>>>> To: benjamin.girault at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:benjamin.girault at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please enclosed find an archive zip containing the three
>>>> source files used for constructing both the good example
>>>> and the bad one. While reconstructing the events I recalled
>>>> the only difference should be digikam version (good one:
>>>> 2.1.0, bad one 2.1.1) as you can easily see from exif data
>>>> of two panorama files present on dropbox.
>>>> I am grateful to you for your interest, hope these files
>>>> will help
>>>> thank you
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Antonio Trincone
>>>> http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone
>>>> http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/
>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/
>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home
>>>> http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Antonio Trincone
>>>> http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone
>>>> http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/
>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/
>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home
>>>> http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Antonio Trincone
>>> http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone
>>> http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/
>>> http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/
>>> http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home
>>> http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Antonio Trincone
>> http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone
>> http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/
>> http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/
>> http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home
>> http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Antonio Trincone
> http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone
> http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/
> http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/
> http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home
> http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20110919/5cf764a6/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list