[Digikam-users] Migration problems - Digikam 1.8 to 2.0
philippe at gcal.net
Mon Sep 12 19:50:50 BST 2011
On Monday, 12 September 2011 05:06:19 Photonoxx wrote:
> What Rinus means is if you write your tag inside your pictures files
> (embedded in their), you don't need specifically to be able to read
> your old database.
> You just can start from scratch and digikam scans the embedded
> metadatas and recreates the database from this.
If that is the _official_ method to upgrade, then what is the point of having
a database in the first place?
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
More information about the Digikam-users