[Digikam-users] Lensfun -- most cameras and lenses missing
photonoxx at free.fr
Tue Nov 1 07:38:04 GMT 2011
I just make the a test, I'm on Opensuse 11.04 and KDE47 stable repository
and things seems to be ok here. My main lens still not here (sigma
17-70mm) but it's due to the fact it is not here I think, since I see a
various manufacturer and lens references (included Canon's ones).
Could be the matter in the packaging ?
Le Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:10:37 +0100, Chris Dennis <cgdennis at btinternet.com>
> On 10/31/2011 09:41 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>> 2011/10/31 Chris Dennis<cgdennis at btinternet.com>:
>>> Hello Digikam people
>>> I've just installed Digikam on a new installation of ArchLinux.
>>> is pretty much up to date -- Digikam is 2.2.0.
>>> Most of it works well, but the Lens Auto-Correction screen only lists
>>> a few
>>> cameras and lenses, nowhere near the whole list that I can see in the
>>> Lensfun xml files. Strangely, the first time I try to use lens
>>> auto-correction, only Samsung cameras are listed; the second time, I
>>> Fujifilm, Kodak, and Nikon too; with further attempts, no more cameras
>>> appear. Which is a pity, because my camera is a Canon.
>>> On the console, I can see these error messages:
>>> digikam(976)/digikam (core) Digikam::DimgInterface::getImg: d->image
>>> is NULL
>>> digikam(976)/digikam (core): ERROR: LensFun Interface Lens device is
>>> Googling on those hasn't turned up anything useful.
>>> It may be that I've got some libraries missing from ArchLinux.
>> No. lensfun (last code), is included in digiKam core. And yes, more
>> lens need to be added.
> Thanks for your reply, but I can see that
> /usr/share/apps/digikam/lensfun/ contains a big range of camera and lens
> definitions; slr-canon.xml contains my camera and my lens. But only a
> few of those definitions show up in digikam.
> I know that digikam is using those files, because changes I make in the
> Samsung file show up in digikam.
> Aha! That suggests a work-around. If I copy the Canon camera and lens
> definitions that I need into the Samsung file, they show up and are
> automatically selected in digikam! So now I can make progress and apply
> corrections to my photos.
> There's a bug in there somewhere though.
Photographe chasseur de lueurs
More information about the Digikam-users