[Digikam-users] Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?
sleepless
sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl
Wed Mar 30 10:52:32 BST 2011
Yeah right, my newbe face looks sometimes quite puzzled reading messages
here. A bit elaboration helps, thanks!
Rinus
On 30-03-11 11:26, Philip Johnsson wrote:
> I'm not sure I that was clear.
>
> I'm aware of that my choice to use code from git (the place where
> developers submit and exchange code while developing) for my "beta3"
> packages have made things a bit confusing when it comes to what is
> what. As the developers had changed in the code to beta4 (only in the
> about dialogue window in digikam) in git a few days after the beta3
> code was released as a official tarball release then the code in my
> packages got the beta4 name but was beta4 code in early development.
> The packages worked as they should but I think it might have made bug
> tracking more difficult and confusing for both users and developers. I
> won't release any more packages using code from git to stay away from
> this kind of confusion and only package official tarball releases,
> even though my debian changelog and the package naming pointed out
> that the code came from git and when.
>
> And to complicate the issue a bit more there was a rebuild of my
> packages of beta3 git code against updated KDE 4.6.1 so it was linked
> against the new libmarble .11 and not the older libmarble .10 that KDE
> 4.6.0 used.
>
> Hope this clear things out when it comes to naming.
>
> /Philip
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Philip Johnsson
> <philip.johnsson at gmail.com <mailto:philip.johnsson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> No. It's just that the "beta3" packages was code from git (which
> was misleading) a few days after the beta3 was released and
> therefore got the name "beta4" (changed in upstream git code) when
> you looked in the about digikam dialog in Digikam. The real full
> beta4 was release the other day both as code and a new package
> updates on my PPA.
>
> /Philip
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, sleepless
> <sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl <mailto:sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl>>
> wrote:
>
> Are there different versions around with the same version number?
>
> I had the Idea that Gilles was a bit surprised when I told him
> that I am using 2.0.0.4 and Philip says "I just uploaded
> packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4". I am already
> a couple of weeks using this version. I am no programmer,
> totaly new to Linux and digikam. I have no idea how I managed
> to have it on my computer.
>
> Could there be any good reasen to remove my version and try
> Philip's one?
> Rinus
>
>
> Op 29-3-2011 22:05, Philip Johnsson schreef:
>> Just a note to all using my PPA.
>>
>> I'm having problems with crashes when importing media from my
>> camera using libgphoto2. It looks like the problem is in
>> libgphoto2 but I didn't have the problem before i updated
>> digikam 2 to beta 4. Doing some tests with libgphoto2 before
>> a digikam 2.0 beta4 bug report is the right place.
>>
>> Just so you know.
>>
>> /Philip
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gilles Caulier
>> <caulier.gilles at gmail.com <mailto:caulier.gilles at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Philip...
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2011/3/29 Philip Johnsson <philip.johnsson at gmail.com
>> <mailto:philip.johnsson at gmail.com>>:
>> > I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam
>> 2.0.0 beta4 (no git code)
>> > on Launchpad and am curently on build. They should be
>> available within the
>> > hour for anyone who want to try them out. As before you
>> find digikam 2.0
>> > packages in my kubuntu-backports PPA for Ubuntu 10.10
>> (maverick) and
>> > instructions on how to install them are to be find in
>> this thread.
>> >
>> > Happy digikaming!
>> >
>> > /Philip
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philip Johnsson
>> > <philip.johnsson at gmail.com
>> <mailto:philip.johnsson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> You can also follow this guide (not made by me):
>> >>
>> http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/install-the-latest-beta-of-digikam-on-ubuntu-10-10/
>> >>
>> >> /Philip
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Photonoxx
>> <photonoxx at free.fr <mailto:photonoxx at free.fr>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you have refresh your repository content ?
>> >>> (it should be with : sudo apt-get update)
>> >>>
>> >>> After that, if you install Digikam package, you will
>> get the 1.9 version,
>> >>> if you want 2.0 beta, you have to install the
>> digikam2 package.
>> >>>
>> >>> Le Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:39:40 +0100, Ozzy
>> <ozzyprv at gmail.com <mailto:ozzyprv at gmail.com>> a écrit:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Then, from CLI, how do I install the beta version?
>> >>> > I normally would type:
>> >>> >> sudo apt-get install digikam
>> >>> > but I don't want to install that one that is in the
>> Ubuntu
>> >>> > repositories.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > O.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > PS: I am so glad that there is no such a thing a
>> stupid question.....
>> >>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Philip Johnsson
>> >>> > <philip.johnsson at gmail.com
>> <mailto:philip.johnsson at gmail.com>>wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> If you mean all the three PPAs then yes.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> /Philip
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> --
>> >>> Nicolas Boulesteix
>> >>> Photographe chasseur de lueurs
>> >>> http://www.photonoxx.fr
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> >>> Digikam-users at kde.org <mailto:Digikam-users at kde.org>
>> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Digikam-users mailing list
>> > Digikam-users at kde.org <mailto:Digikam-users at kde.org>
>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org <mailto:Digikam-users at kde.org>
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org <mailto:Digikam-users at kde.org>
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>>
>> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
>> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>> Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3537 - datum van
>> uitgifte: 03/29/11
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org <mailto:Digikam-users at kde.org>
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20110330/8cd50bb0/attachment.html>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list