[Digikam-users] Increase face recognition hit rate

[Erick Moreno]

There's a thing that could make our tag faces work easier.

Now, when Digikam suggest that a face matches a tag, it puts that face among
the others that you already confirmed as a face to that tag, and makes this
without any visual distinction.

Because of it, when you take a general look to a face tag, you can not
distinguish faces suggested by Digikam from the ones that you manually
confirmed. You need to lay you mouse over the face to identify that isn't
confirmed yet.

I think that digikam suggested faces unconfirmed yet must be visually marked
to make them easier to identify.

Anyone agrees?

[]'s
Erick Moreno


On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Anders Stedtlund <falolaf at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Rinus,
>
> You are correct about the last applied tag so that's a little bit easier.
>
> /Anders
>
> 2011/8/21 sleepless <sleeplessregulus at hetnet.nl>:
> > That´s the state it is in at the moment, as far as I know, never heard of
> > anybody having success with it. But detecting faces works great, and as
> it
> > always suggests the latest applied tag for a face, you can go pritty
> quick
> > through all by looking for the same person all the time, and go for the
> next
> > one if finished.
> > If the state of matters has been changed recently I would be happy to
> read
> > about it.
> >
> > Rinus
> >
> > Op 21-08-11 15:49, Anders Stedtlund schreef:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have started to use the face detection/recognition features in
> >> digiKam 2.0.0 and now I'm wondering on how to increase the hit rate
> >> for the recognition. As it is now it's 0 %.
> >>
> >> digiKam has detected just over 4000 face and I have manually added
> >> peoples to a couple of hundred of them but still no luck with the
> >> automatic face recognition.
> >>
> >> I have played around with the parameter (Fast/Accurate) but it doesn't
> >> seem to do anything to the result. Do I have to search and merge more?
> >> Do I have to manually add tags to more faces? Both takes some time
> >> though...
> >>
> >> /Anders
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Digikam-users mailing list
> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>



-- 
*Erick Moreno*
https://profiles.google.com/erickmoreno<https://profiles.google.com/erickmoreno/about>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20110821/d1bd3404/attachment.html>