[Digikam-users] Re: Fwd: 1.6 svn matter when metadata are modified outside of Digikam

[Photonoxx]

No idea about that ?

Le Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:30:49 +0100, Photonoxx <photonoxx at free.fr> a écrit:>
> Hi,
>
> I just notice something annoying with Digikam. First of all I think the
> matter came from CaptureNX, but it seems now, that Digikam is the source
> of this matter.
>
> I use Digikam svn version (updated today) with Ubuntu 10.10 64 bits. Here
> are the details :
>
>
> digiKam version 1.6.0 (rev.: 1196931)
> Dématriçage parallélisé: Oui
> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JP2: Oui
> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JPEG: Oui
> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PGF: Non
> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PNG: Oui
> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier TIFF: Oui
> Exiv2 prend en charge les métadonnées XMP: Oui
> LibCImg: 130
> LibClapack: internal library
> LibExiv2: 0.19
> LibJPEG: 62
> LibJasper: 1.900.1
> LibKDE: 4.5.1 (KDE 4.5.1)
> LibKExiv2: 1.2.0
> LibKdcraw: 1.2.0
> LibLCMS: 118
> LibLensFun: external shared library
> LibLqr: internal library
> LibPGF: 6.09.44 - internal library
> LibPNG: 1.2.44
> LibQt: 4.7.0
> LibRaw: 0.11.2
> LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.9.4 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler
> Copyright (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
> Élément graphique Marble: 0.10.1
> LibGphoto2: 2.4.8
> LibKipi: 1.2.0
> Moteur de base de données: QSQLITE
>
>
> In fact, I edited some pictures with CaptureNX (under Virtualbox and a
> Digikam collection as a shared folder) after rating them with Digikam  
> with
> in mind to only working on best ones.
>
> When I was working, I changed my mind about one picture, and add a rating
> to it, but when I'm going back in Digikam, the change has been viewed by
> Digikam since Digikam update its thumbnail, but the rating was not  
> updated.
>
> What let me think that Digikam is responsible here, is if I'm going in
> "Image" menu and choosing "Lire à nouveau les métadonnées à partir de
> l'image" (read once again metadatas from the image or something like that
> in english), then, the rating appear correctly. After testing, it is the
> same thing for some other metadata like keywords.
>
> I check the option at the first start for Digikam to "scan for new item  
> at
> start up", but apparently, modifications are viewed (thumbnail update),
> but metadatas are not rescanned.
>
> Is there anybody else experienced this ? Is there something I missed ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicolas
>
>


-- 
--
Nicolas Boulesteix
Photographe chasseur de lueurs
http://www.photonoxx.fr