[Digikam-users] Digikam internal precision?

[Gilles Caulier]

This is why, working with RAW file is interresting here. RAW is 12/14
bits color depth format. digiKam store it as 16 bits color depth
internally. All manipulation are processed with 16 bits. It's
definitively better than 8 bits.

At end you export to 8 bits with JPEG.

Gilles Caulier

2010/1/20 Greg Kennedy <kennedy.greg at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:22 AM, gerlos <gerlosgm at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Il giorno 19/gen/2010, alle ore 08.40, Gilles Caulier ha scritto:
>>
>>> 2010/1/19 Greg Kennedy <kennedy.greg at gmail.com>:
>>>> But would it not help, say if you were doing repeatedly lots of
>>>> operations, to prevent loss of quality due to imprecision in 8-bit?  If
>>>> the 8-bit numbers were expanded to 16 bit (say mul. by 256) then you
>>>> could do all kinds of operations on them, then save the result back as
>>>> 8-bit rounded or truncated.
>>>
>>> With current code to convert 8 to 16, no, because expanded histogram
>>> has holes everywhere. Color informations are missing.
>>
>> This is true, after we convert to 16 bits there are holes everywhere, but after a little tinkering with the image (for example denoising, blurring, curves adjust, ...) don't we get a more uniform histogram?
>> Image editing don't spread that color informations around?
>>
>> From this point of view, don't you think that working in 16 bits and truncating them back to 8 bits could be useful?
>>
>> These are only my hypothesis. I'm sure you can give us better explanations. Or maybe we need some experiments with some images...
>>
>> bye
>> gerlos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>
> Right, that was my thinking: convert 8 -> 16 (or 24, 32, etc) gives no
> benefit until you start doing image manipulations.  Sometimes I adjust
> white balance, then further do brightness / contrast adjust, then
> change the saturation.  All these repeated manips done in 8-bit surely
> have a loss in precision, while 16+ bit would help to prevent that to
> some degree.
>
> (Yes I could probably do it all in one go with curves, but that's
> unfamiliar territory for me...)
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>