[Digikam-users] Exif Inromation

[Arnd Baecker]

On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Mister Woody wrote:

> Well if exiv2 sucks,

As this if-clause is not fullfilled...

> maybe digikam should find an alternative,

... there is no need for this consequence.

> such as
> exiftool. At least this is my opinion.

If you have concrete improvements in mind, politely ask
the exiv2 project, see http://dev.exiv2.org/wiki/exiv2 for further
details.

Best, Arnd

> Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > Ask to Exiv2 project. Improvements of metadata parsers must be done in
> > this library
> >
> > Gilles Caulier
> >
> > 2009/9/13 mrwoody <mister.woody at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi *.
> >> Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam?
> >> As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the picture
> >> than exif2.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> --
> >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Exif-Inromation-tp25421482p25421482.html
> >> Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Digikam-users mailing list
> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
>