[Digikam-users] lots of photos and startup time

Andi Clemens andi.clemens at gmx.net
Tue Jul 7 19:15:22 BST 2009


Ok, it really is a little bit slower WITH the splash enabled then without it.
Approximately 2 seconds... weird.

Andi

On Tuesday 07 July 2009 20:12:01 Andi Clemens wrote:
> Oh I have not "scanning" enabled. But I will do so now...
>
> Andi
>
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 20:00:21 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > 2009/7/7 Andi Clemens <andi.clemens at gmx.net>:
> > > Hmm Gilles I don't have a progress bar when I disable the splashscreen.
> > > Am I misunderstanding you here?
> > > But it is not faster or slower, now that the splash is disabled.
> >
> > Here i have progress dialog, if scan at startup is enable.
> >
> > In theory, this must be the same time, but mechanisms in code to post
> > progress is a little bit different.
> >
> > Gilles
> >
> > > Andi
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 07 July 2009 19:55:42 Andi Clemens wrote:
> > >> Hmm there is something different then the splashcreen? Never seen
> > >> that! ;-)
> > >> Ok I will check. But again for me startup time is quite normal, I
> > >> don't think 7 seconds is too much for so many images (and remember,
> > >> all libs need to be loaded on first run, too).
> > >> But over 1 minute and more is strange and has been reported a lot for
> > >> reiserFS partitions.
> > >>
> > >> I will create a reiserFS partition later on and test it.
> > >>
> > >> Andi
> > >>
> > >> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 19:48:22 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > >> > Andi,
> > >> >
> > >> > just a stupid question : do you run splashscreen at startup or
> > >> > progress dialog ? Can you switch to check the difference ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Gilles Caulier
> > >> >
> > >> > 2009/7/7 Bruce Marshall <bmarsh at bmarsh.com>:
> > >> > > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Andi Clemens wrote:
> > >> > >> Hmm seems to be a reiserFS problem, since every one reporting
> > >> > >> this is using reiserFS, also the older reports are talking about
> > >> > >> reiser.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Takes me 1:20  on an EXT3 disk running XFCE  and Digikam  0.10.0
> > >> > >
> > >> > > One problem I have is that all of my pictures are in two albums,
> > >> > > but they are the same album.   In otherwords, two albums pointing
> > >> > > to the same directory. So it may be doing twice the work when it
> > >> > > wouldn't have to.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I haven't yet figured out a way to get rid of the duplicate since
> > >> > > eliminating one album would delete all of the pictures in it!!
> > >> > > Don't know why Digikam was designed to operate that way.  You
> > >> > > should be able to remove an album from Digikam  without having to
> > >> > > delete anything.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > Digikam-users mailing list
> > >> > > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > >> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > >> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Digikam-users mailing list
> > >> Digikam-users at kde.org
> > >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Digikam-users mailing list
> > > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users




More information about the Digikam-users mailing list