[Digikam-users] Building a better raw conversion tool for digiKam ?
photonoxx at free.fr
Wed Dec 23 23:54:48 GMT 2009
Le Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:54:53 +0100, Mark Greenwood
<fatgerman at ntlworld.com> a écrit:
> As an example, let me describe how it works with my Nikon. If I use
> Nikon CaptureNX I can pump RAW files through it with a preset of, say,
> "Vivid" and it will pump out JPEGs that look great. But I can get
> *Identical* results by shooting in JPEG with the camera settings set to
> "Vivid". So why bother with RAW at all? To my mind the whole point of
> RAW is that I want to adjust each picture individually. If you want to
> apply the same settings to every picture, shoot JPEG and let the camera
> do it.
Personnaly, I don't have to manage a lot of RAW file to produce JPEG (or
TIFF). I use Digikam to manage all my photos (tag, organize, etc...), and
treat only some selected files with CaptureNX.
I'm not agree to say that starting with a near JPEG shooted decoded RAW is
a useless thing.
I use too CaptureNX2, and I don't use it to just get the same thing than I
can get in shooting in JPEG.
the first thing is RAW offer Burning-up and underexposure correction
possibility. With JPEG, a burned zone stay burned... RAW permit to get
things from zero, but why, if I set intentionally my camera it will be not
valuable to start with what I want to get ?
The most often, my use of CaptureNX consist in what follows :
Correct, if needed, exposure (sometimes) and whiteBalance (rarely)
Correct, if any, burned-up and underexposed zones (CaptureNX2 have a great
and easy tool for that)
and now, begin the treatment like local contrast (u-point), BW conversion,
glowing effect, blur etc...
And I appreciate to don't have to find initial set each time.
After, on some forum I meet some people who don't mind about camera shoot
parameters because they can set after with RAW... it's not my way of
Nicolas Boulesteix - Chasseur de lueurs - http://www.photonoxx.fr
More information about the Digikam-users