[Digikam-users] New User: is digiKam right for me? and if not, what alternative?
Yuval Levy
digikam08 at sfina.com
Tue Jan 29 07:11:35 GMT 2008
Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
>> digiKam was significantly slower than gqview. Unfortunately too slow for
>> me. So my question is: why is it so slow (after all, most tools use
>> dcraw for RAW decoding)? and: can I do something to help change that?
>
> I can only second what Gilles has already said: compare the same things!
>
> digiKam can't be slow in RAW decoding because if you compare it to dcraw it
> matches. In other words, it can't be faster than dcraw. If other applications
> are, they use degraded modes of dcraw like half resolution and 8 bit
> decoding, linear interpolation.
have I hurt some feelings here?
with all due respect, I have not compared the quality. I have not
compared bit depth nor accuracy. I did not check if it removes chromatic
aberration, nor if it applies a noise filter.
Because at this stage, *speed* is the factor that counts, at a thumbnail
quality, displayed on an 8bit LCD. A better than needed quality for a
longer processing time is not an improvement to me.
All the other qualities become important at a later stage, when
*developing* an image from a RAW file.
Today I got back with 2x 2GB Flash cards full of RAWs. I will end up
using maybe 10% of that, and for that 10% I will want all the accuracy
you are asking me to compare. But while just browsing the catalog I
don't need that.
There are two type of process: interactive and automated. The most
important factor for interactive processes is *time*, because human time
is limited and expensive.
Probably Canon's DPP, Adobe's Lightroom, Apple's Aperture and other
professional tools use two different algorythms, one for the thumbnails
and for browsing; the other for exporting images from the RAW files. I
don't really care how they do it - the browsing is faster and this is
what counts to me.
human time is expensive. A tool that makes me wait for a higher quality
conversion than what I need is *worse* IMO than a tool that adapts its
quality to my needs and saves my time.
Yuv
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list