[Digikam-users] Beta1 for Digikam 0.10.0 ?

[Gerhard Kulzer]

I too vote for it (as a frequent GPS user, including digiKam) :-)

Gerhard

On Wednesday 20 February 2008 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> 2008/2/20, Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg at gmx.de>:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This list of new features is impressive ! thanks for the good work.
> > >
> > > By the way concerning GPS, does the database (in Digikam 0.10) contains
> > > a field to represent the precision of the GPS data ?
> >
> > No, we do not have this field in the database so far.
> > It would be a double floating point value in meters (or degrees?), which
> > can
> > be regarded as expected imprecision of the longitude/latitude values (the
> > correct value lies in the range longitude/latitude +/- precision).
> > For GPS tags, it could be derived from the "GPS Dilution of Precision"
> > value
> > if available, and a constant value assumed for GPS.
> > For coordinates set by Google map or Marble, it would be derived from the
> > zoom
> > level at setting the point.
> > We could not store it in the image metadata with standard exif tags.
> >
> > The question is, do we need this, will we make use of it?
> > One could argue that real GPS data is very exact, and if you set your
> > coordinates yourself, do it as exactly as you want.
> > Viewpoints
> 
> 
> I vote for it if this have a scence for GPS searches..
> 
> GPS guru viewpoints are welcome here...
> 
> Gilles
> 



-- 
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·... ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·...¸ ><((((º>
http://www.gerhard.fr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20080220/4670d904/attachment.sig>